Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Hi
I am looking for a distro and I have following requirements;
1. It should be a full rolling distro.
2. It should be available in minimal iso which contains kernel along with basic system utilities but no gui or any desktop.
3. It should be an independent distro and not based on any other.
4. It should contain a package manager.
Can anyone tell me about a distro which fulfils this requirements?
Regards
Arch is good, as mentioned above. Debian testing or unstable are also essentially rolling distros, though Arch is probably a bit more bleeding edge. There's also aptosid (based on Debian unstable branch) and OpenSuse (only if you use the Tumbleweed repositories). And we can't forget Gentoo...
Arch is good but its package manager is not as good as debian. For example, its package manager downloads very slow and also takes a lot of break between downloading every file, also it does not give the remaining time, is there any way to make arch's package manager more explanatory?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.