LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2003, 12:01 PM   #1
pariksheet
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: RedHat 9.0
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
What happened to RedHat?


I believe RedHat has abandoned future plans to release Desktop OSs

What does that mean for us? Is it time for a change over?

Debian anyone?
 
Old 08-01-2003, 12:22 PM   #2
Mathieu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Distribution: RedHat, Fedora, CentOS, SUSE
Posts: 1,403

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
I believe RedHat has abandoned future plans to release Desktop OSs

I don't recall hearing about this.
Where was this news story posted ?
 
Old 08-01-2003, 12:25 PM   #3
pariksheet
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: RedHat 9.0
Posts: 9

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
The India Linux Users Group (ILUG)

http://www.linux-delhi.org/

RedHat is apparently only concentrating on Servers...
 
Old 08-01-2003, 01:07 PM   #4
Mathieu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Distribution: RedHat, Fedora, CentOS, SUSE
Posts: 1,403

Rep: Reputation: 46
The site is down.

In the end, it does not matter.
You can always download RPMs or tarballs and force it to be a server/desktop.
 
Old 08-01-2003, 01:24 PM   #5
hairston4
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Debian / Vector Linux 4
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
What about Re Hat X
 
Old 08-01-2003, 06:50 PM   #6
diabelek
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
redhat "X" should really be called redhat 9.1 (or maybe even 8.2) a change of the major version number is completely unwarranted for many reasons (assuming the don't change their mind before the final release)
1. they didn't update to the 2.6 kernel.
2. there were/are no "major" improvements in the os or software provided
3. calling it "X" makes me shudder from thoughts of it emulating mac (or windows 2)

my thought on redhat 10 is that they just want to get their version number heigher than mandrake or any other major distro. upgrading to 10 is pointless in my opinion. i'm only testing it because its part of my job and i have no plans on moving to it. I'll just dl the new packages/patches and upgrade that way.

those are just my thoughts on redhat X beta (9.0.93)
i'll let the flame wars begin on those comments
 
Old 08-02-2003, 01:28 PM   #7
Edward78
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Distribution: OpenSuSE 11
Posts: 441

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
1. they didn't update to the 2.6 kernel.
That is only in beta.
 
Old 08-02-2003, 04:07 PM   #8
misc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Distribution: Red Hat + Fedora
Posts: 1,084

Rep: Reputation: 54
Exclamation

Red Hat will no longer be producing and selling "boxed sets" of Red Hat Linux, because that slows down development and is a major hindrance with a product that has a short release cycle (~ 6 months). They will continue developing Red Hat Linux using a more community-oriented development model.

Read more about the opened development process of the "Red Hat Linux Project" on http://rhl.redhat.com when that page opens again with the content you could see a few days after the RHLP announcement.
 
Old 08-12-2003, 07:41 PM   #9
tbellas
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
Red hat will no longer sell cd's? Only download iso or something?
 
Old 08-12-2003, 11:20 PM   #10
JaseP
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Distribution: K/Ubuntu 18.04-14.04, Scientific Linux 6.3-6.4, Android-x86, Pretty much all distros at one point...
Posts: 1,802

Rep: Reputation: 157Reputation: 157
I was looking for a replacement for Mandrake 8.2 on my system because it was getting old... I had considered RedHat 9 for a while, but determined that any Distro that was going to be shifting away from a packaged CD model and over to a download only model (or mail-order for burned CDs only model) was not for me. So therefore I chose SuSE 8.2 (I'll be sick of the numbers 8 and 2 pretty soon).

I'm glad I did. Despite some minor annoyances with not being able to run some of my games just yet, I think SuSE is poised to be the biggest winner among the distros. It has IBM in its corner, various European contracts, and the US Gov't approval for use in Gov't computers, just to name a few of its advantages...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what happened ?? bejiita Slackware 5 03-03-2005 03:56 AM
What just happened.... midgcool Linux - Software 2 11-25-2004 05:10 PM
what happened? chief Linux - Software 8 08-04-2003 11:19 AM
redhat 9.0 dual, boot What happened to ntlrd? jimp Linux - Distributions 3 04-24-2003 06:14 PM
What's happened to me? Steave Linux - General 0 09-14-2001 09:22 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration