LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2009, 11:13 AM   #1
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
What distro would be right for me? (Based on some needs and wants.)


I want some suggestions for a distro to use.

The number one requirement is that it must not use PulseAudio, and ideally not be likely to any time soon. On Ubuntu Karmic it's just screwed up my sound, and I think it's way overengineered. I don't need per-app volume controls or network streaming audio, I need reliable sound playback. Plain ALSA gives me that.

It also needs to run well on my hardware. Dual Pentium III 866 MHz, 512 MB RAM, nVidia GeForce 6200. I don't normally have any performance problems running 'full' distros, but extreme eye-candy is out.

Besides that, the following are preferable:

* Regular release cycle, at least annually. Up-to-date software versions.
* Upgradable easily.
* Good sized repository. I admit little beats Ubuntu, but I'm after a lot more than say Puppy.
* Something that puts me in control. I want to be able to configure things and not have them unexpectedly overridden.
* Have Gnome. Doesn't need to be the default, just at least option.
* Be free as in beer.
* Strong ecosystem. I don't want something that's not going to be active in 12 months.
* Have a lightweight version for my other computer (an old laptop).

A couple I'm thinking about at the moment. Slackware. I know I'd be in control, but I'm worried it may be a bit conservative on software versions, and Gnome isn't in the official repos.

Vector's another. I'm using the light version on my laptop and it's very good. But again, reservations about the lack of Gnome.

What do people think?
 
Old 10-27-2009, 11:17 AM   #2
repo
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 8,529

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
Debian
 
Old 10-27-2009, 11:34 AM   #3
hurry_hui
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: Near Jakarta
Distribution: Slackware, Arch, Slax, Porteus, Tiny Core, Slitaz
Posts: 355
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 52
Archlinux...rolling-release distro and very light
 
Old 10-27-2009, 01:22 PM   #4
Phin666
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Distribution: Manjaro KDE (desktop) Cinnamon (laptop)
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 18
Why not just stick with Ubuntu and remove Pulseaudio?
 
Old 10-27-2009, 01:28 PM   #5
Lordandmaker
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 258

Rep: Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by repo View Post
Debian
I'd go with this, too.

New releases don't come out annually, but Testing and Unstable are rolling updates, and Testing really isn't that unstable. Unstable is.

Aside from that, it matches all your other wants.
 
Old 10-28-2009, 02:15 AM   #6
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phin666 View Post
Why not just stick with Ubuntu and remove Pulseaudio?
I tried that. But it doesn't work all that well. For one, there's then no gnome volume control in the system tray, I had to use KMix. For two, it ended up put back when I did updates. I guess Karmic is still a beta, so maybe it won't happen when it's in full release - but I still don't trust it. Besides, I've other minor gripes with Ubuntu. I just generally feel the distro's gone down since...Hardy, maybe Intrepid. I'm just not happy with Ubuntu any more.
 
Old 10-30-2009, 06:38 PM   #7
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
I've gone with Arch. So far I'm liking it. The install and configuration obviously required some effort, but wasn't hard for myself. Using LXDE at the moment, but Gnome's there if I decide I want it. And my sound is flawless :-)
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sorce based distro (gentoo) Vs Binary based distro(fedora, debian,..) ashwin_cse Linux - Distributions 7 02-08-2010 01:46 PM
Improving Slackware (based) distros all to one new Slackware based distro Secu-Slack Slackware 45 02-15-2009 10:42 PM
How to convert a rpm based distro into deb (apt-get) distro ? pleasehelpme Linux - Newbie 3 02-11-2008 12:20 AM
Distro based on what? Fritz_Monroe Linux - Newbie 4 12-01-2005 11:02 AM
Distro: Less scripting. Looking for mainly Elf binary based distro Z505 Linux - General 1 04-02-2005 11:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration