Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'd like to upgrade to a better kernel. I have FC2, so most things are rpm-based.
The alternatives look like:
> Get a kernel from kernel.org (and read the Kernel HOWTO)
> Get a kernel rpm
If I grab a new kernel from kernel.org and slap it in (and tell the bootloader about it, etc), will that affect anything else about my FC2 system's integrity?
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
not if the kernel is properly configured
i would go with the kernel.org version and compile it myself
that's not too hard
before doing that i'd do something like ''lspci | lp" or something like that to get a hardware snapshot for configuring the kernel properly
but no... it shoudn't
ps.. when you go to tell your bootloader about the new kernel... make sure it can still find your old kernel in case something goes wrong
Unless you have a very good reason to compile your own kernel, stick to rpms provided by Fedora. Compiling your own is asking for trouble unless you really know what you're doing, so unless Fedora kernels are not working for you, I just don't see the point.
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
good idea... yes rpms are easier, but if you do it properly, compiling a kernel will make your system run faster and more optimized, like the difference between going to kohls for a suit or going to a tailor
Just some of my experience: I've compiled kernels under FC2 and while there may be some issues (in the past), it's not all that hard. If it doesn't work first time, you can change the settings and recompile. Once you get the gist, it gets easier. Plus, you can reuse the settings when you upgrade the kernel. We all started from somewhere.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.