The Utterly Improbably Huge "Which Distro" SuperMegaThread
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello everyone. I am looking for advice on what distro to use.
I am currently running a dual-NIC router with DHCP, DNS, DDNS, SSH, Samba, VNC, and Remote Desktop.
This machine will never be used as a desktop, and requires no additional applications whatsoever, however I like GUI tools used for server administration. I would like to use a distro that has very low overhead, but still has a powerful, professional desktop with plenty of toys for my server. I do not fear the console, but I like "point-and-click" configuration of my desktop. I prefer wizards to writing scripts. Any opinions, recommendations, suggestions, and personal experiences are welcome.
We certainly do! And I have move this thread to it.
To break the question down, you're looing for a more point and click version of Linux to use on a server - so CentOS, OpenSuse, Ubuntu Server Edition....
We certainly do! And I have move this thread to it.
To break the question down, you're looing for a more point and click version of Linux to use on a server - so CentOS, OpenSuse, Ubuntu Server Edition....
Can you elaborate on why those are your particular favorites? Just to reitterate, I don't JUST want a nice GUI. I would like as many GUI tools as possible while still having as light as possible of an OS. A distro that installs with no desktop backgrounds, sounds, themes or applications would be nice.
I have already used the distro selection wizards. I wanted to see if anyone had any personal experience that may differ from what the automated tests suggest.
Mainly because those are 3 of the more popular server distros. If you want something very configurable go with Slackware or Debian or Gentoo - all 3 have GUIs and all 3 are configurable enough to give you exactly what you need. That said, this is Linux and any distro will be configurable enough to give you the ideal server you are looking for. Though it will depend on how much time you personally want to spend getting there.
can anyone suggest a nice lightweight and easy to use distro?
It's for my parents aging laptop.
The most important requirements will be a simple browser and e-mail client. Also they'd like their pcmcia wireless card to work (sorry cant remember what chipset it uses)
Their lappy has
1gb p3 processor,
256mb ram
64mb twister graphics
DVD drive.
Normally I recommend Cross Linux from Scratch. But, I understand how quickly it gets old taking care of the family's computers, I'll recommend one of the *buntus.
Honestly, forget about Gentoo or slackware, unless you really love to go technical.
I don't really remember doing anything "technical" with this install of Slackware I'm now posting from. With others I have, to some extent, but it's nothing I wouldn't have done in Ubuntu or Fedora. Use Slackware before calling it technical
Slackware has long lost it's crown as "only for the very technical", it's still more traditional than others but it's straightforward and there's loads of info on the net about it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.