LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2007, 10:08 PM   #16
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
... Unless they happen to have new hardware, or want to change some hardware component in the next 18 months.
If you want something to "just work", you're not going to be upgrading your hardware often (if ever).
 
Old 04-26-2007, 06:43 PM   #17
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacKuo
If you want something to "just work", you're not going to be upgrading your hardware often (if ever).
That's an interesting view. So you never upgrade components on your system? That seems like a serious limitation to me.
 
Old 04-26-2007, 07:06 PM   #18
farslayer
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Distribution: linuxdebian
Posts: 7,249
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 191Reputation: 191
It's a valid point actually. if you have a production server you don't upgrade parts if it's working. you just let it run, and run, and run... until it gets too old to handle the workload.
 
Old 04-26-2007, 07:07 PM   #19
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
I rarely upgrade my computers. Instead, I'll build an entirely new computer every few years.

I just don't see the point in an upgrade which doesn't give me a big speed boost, and that usually means a new socket requiring at least a new CPU, new motherboard, and new RAM. Usually a new PSU is required also. Ever since I figured out how to do diskless netbooting, that's practically an entire computer right there. I keep around older computers for various purposes. There are a lot of cool and fun things I can only do with multiple computers.
 
Old 04-26-2007, 07:34 PM   #20
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by farslayer
It's a valid point actually. if you have a production server you don't upgrade parts if it's working. you just let it run, and run, and run... until it gets too old to handle the workload.
I agree that's valid with a production server, but the OP specifically stated that he wasn't running one. We're talking desktop box here.
 
Old 04-28-2007, 03:39 PM   #21
uselpa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Luxemburg
Distribution: Slackware, OS X
Posts: 1,507

Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
My recommendation is always the same ... New Debian users should use Testing (now Lenny).
And my question is always the same - how quick does it get security updates?
I'm heavily flirting with Debian at the moment, but I want something _rather_ recent with security updates.
 
Old 04-28-2007, 04:30 PM   #22
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 62
It gets security updates on pretty much the same schedule as Stable. There was a time, long ago, that Testing did not get security updates unless they migrated in from Unstable. But for the last couple years, Testing has it's own security team and gets regular security updates.

Last edited by rickh; 04-29-2007 at 08:01 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
comes with Debian, should I switch distros? GuySkarpz Linux - General 6 09-12-2006 07:54 AM
thread switch results in kernel stack switch superstition Linux - General 1 05-17-2005 11:48 PM
On KDE-centric distros and 686 distros, what you think? mebrelith Linux - Distributions 4 03-23-2005 01:09 PM
Kernel Recompile & switch distros Tarential Linux - Software 1 08-29-2004 09:47 PM
set up DSL thru SWITCH - winXp connected to SWITCH too husz Linux - Newbie 5 04-22-2004 12:08 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration