LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2010, 11:11 AM   #1
bmn
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Seeking Lightweight -toram Distribution for SSH/RDESKTOP/X11


Relatively new to the Linux scene, I've found myself carrying a copy of SLAX in my pocket on a bootable thumb-drive, which I use whenever I sit down on a public computer on my university campus.

I don't do any local work on the machine, and primarily only use it either to 'ssh' or 'rdesktop' to other, remote, machines. I boot Linux over the existing Windoze on the machines only in order to juke keyloggers and keep my machines secure.

I picked SLAX because, when I boot to the thumb-drive, it offers me the "Copy to RAM" option, which allows me to immediately put the thumb-drive back in my pocket. If I had to leave it in the machine, I would almost certainly forget it when I stood up to leave.

Considering how little actual work the distro itself does (even Firefox is negotiable, I could do without), I'm starting to get the feeling that SLAX is relatively overkill.

I feel that there's something out there that could satisfy my needs and provide me with a boot time that is orders of magnitude faster.

To reiterate, all I use my bootable Linux thumb-drive for is to 'ssh' to a command-line session on a remote machine, or to 'rdesktop' to a remote Windows machine. I'm looking for something with the fastest possible boot time.

I wouldn't even need a GUI at all, except it has to be able to render my 'rdesktop' session, and I occasionally launch graphical applications across my 'ssh' session via X11 forwarding. (If that makes any sense. I really am a noob.)
 
Old 04-14-2010, 11:28 AM   #2
smoker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17
Posts: 2,279

Rep: Reputation: 248Reputation: 248Reputation: 248
Damn Small Linux ?

http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/wiki/i...SB_Flash_Drive
 
Old 04-14-2010, 11:31 AM   #3
reed9
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
All of these can run in RAM. Not sure if rdesktop comes by default in them, but ssh should be in the default package list for all.

http://slitaz.org/

http://www.tinycorelinux.com/

http://www.puppylinux.com/

http://partedmagic.com/
 
Old 04-14-2010, 11:35 AM   #4
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,084

Rep: Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336
and if you dont need GUI as you said, see GRML small/medium
http://grml.org/
which boots to ram and has persistency

slack-mini-server boots toram
http://sms.it-ccs.com/downloads.html
and you can add the kde desktop as module

debian live "standard" noX off cd/usb/hdd with persistency and toram
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/re...e/i386/iso-cd/

smallest may be tinycore or microcore(noX) with toram and persistency
http://tinycorelinux.com/
 
Old 04-14-2010, 07:08 PM   #5
bmn
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2009
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
While I certainly appreciate the responses, there seems to be a bit of confusion on size versus speed.

I don't really care about size. Hell, when it comes to thumb drives, I'm not sure why anybody does. Staples.com won't even sell you a flash drive smaller than 4GB anymore.

I tried a few of these, and, case in point, Damn Small Linux was one of the slowest booting distributions I've tried so far. Even Ubuntu booted faster.

(Our lab machines are not inferior hardware. They are 2.8 GHz quad-cores with 8GB of ram. They are only slow because of all the crap they installed on top of Wind0ze)

That being said, the recommendations here ultimately led me in the right direction, and I am grateful for that.

I have temporarily settled on xPUD. It goes from Power-On to CPU-Idle in about six seconds. I am extremely impressed with it's performance.
 
Old 04-14-2010, 09:40 PM   #6
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,084

Rep: Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336
You may like Sidux too, boots very fast and has a huge repo available
http://sidux.com/
 
  


Reply

Tags
fastboot, lightweight, linux, minimal, rdesktop, ssh, x11


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
seeking lightweight desktop environment for lower spec PCs bradfuller Linux - Desktop 40 08-16-2012 11:06 PM
Toram or not Toram...and the Memory remains the same....?! linus72 Linux - General 2 01-16-2010 09:31 AM
Seeking lightweight liveCD with truecrypt and xfce or lxde desktop Cinematography Linux - Distributions 14 12-19-2009 01:56 PM
Lightweight GUI/Library for X11 (ideally a C++ interface) cpetzol2 Programming 5 05-02-2008 07:34 PM
Compose special characters under X11 in rdesktop spiky Linux - General 1 06-10-2004 07:34 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration