Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
View Poll Results: Is it worth upgrading RedHat 7.2 to version 7.3?
Yes it definitely is. It's a very mature and stable product, and the latest packages that come with it are a nice bonus.
No, version 7.3 is still too "raw", kind of like version 7.0, I suggest that you stay away from it for now...
Upgrading to 7.3 will not gain anything big, just a few bells and whistles (like KDE 3.0), so if you care for eyecandy, go for the upgrade, otherwise don't bother, it's not worth your time.
Well, folks, do you think it's worth upgrading RH7.2 to RH7.3? So far I've been very much pleased with RH7.2, it seems like a very mature product to me. Let me also tell you that I was very much displeased with RH7.0, to me it felt like a very premature release, did not even have the 2.4 kernel, lots of bugs, e.t.c. I just don't want to go through all the trouble of upgrading and downloading the ISOs and ending up with a thorny version like 7.0.
Any feedback on this will be greatly appreciated. If you don't feel like providing feedback, at least contribute to the poll... Oh, and please, do not suggest other distros. Thanx!
Last edited by sewer_monkey; 05-31-2002 at 03:55 PM.
Personally I tried installing it as beta ran into alot of problems eventually gave up went back to 7.2...ok its beta easy to understand...7.3 is released finally, im all for it i install it and notice right away some problems i have with it, for the first time since i started toying with linux learning what i could it froze on me while in screensaver mode..no biggie winxp does that to me when i play a full screen game or screensaver..but thats been fixed with a driver update from ATI...anyways i tried to run cvs for gaim last night after re installing 7.3 again cuz i missed that nifty up2date applet.....and it gave me an error saying i was missing autoconf, and automake....ehhh ok so i install those now i need aclocal.....tried finding it only thing i found was ac-archive i believe is what its called and now its calling for me to copy some files from usr/share....never had this problem with 7.2 so i think i will go back to 7.2 being a quitter for a bit until i have the time to mess with some of that again =D over all i like eyecandy
I think it's worth to upgrade, if you have time.
At least you get new kernel, newer server packages.. and of course kde 3 and other funky stuff
I could hardly beleive anyone saying it is less stable than 7.2, because there isn't anything newer. Think of major changes between 6.2-7.0 => kernel (7.0 not good)
7.0-7.1 => true kernel 2.4 support added stability (7.1 much better than 7.0)
7.1-7.2 => ext3 fs (7.2 best so far)
7.2-7.3 => kde3 not really fundamental for stability, especially in runlevel3 (7.3 no reason to be worse than 7.2)