Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have already tried the following distros and I do not like them:
Suse 10.1
OpenSuse 10.2
Ubuntu 6.10
Suse does not work with my sound card and it is to difficult to use, and ubuntu does not support crap, it doesn't support ati driver, rpm files, and I especially dispise it. I need a distro that works for the following drives and is still easy to use:
ATI Radeon X300
Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live! 24-Bit (Internal)
I do not care about the size of the distributions or what their requirements are as this is not an old computer, it is fairly new. Thank you for your suggestions.
This is the distro I use and recommend, Why because it works right out of the box. No need to configure Everything, everything just works. It also comes as a 1 CD install that is a live CD that you can install later if you wish.
I have already tried the following distros and I do not like them:
Suse 10.1
OpenSuse 10.2
Ubuntu 6.10
Suse does not work with my sound card and it is to difficult to use, and ubuntu does not support crap, it doesn't support ati driver, rpm files, and I especially dispise it. I need a distro that works for the following drives and is still easy to use:
ATI Radeon X300
Creative Labs Sound Blaster Live! 24-Bit (Internal)
I do not care about the size of the distributions or what their requirements are as this is not an old computer, it is fairly new. Thank you for your suggestions.
What was wrong with Ubuntu... Ubuntu doesn't need to support RPM files, it uses deb files. However, if you're adamant about using RPM files, there's a program called Alien, that will translate any RPM, into a Deb file for Ubuntu. Its in the repositories, and would take little effort to install. 99% of the apps you'll want/need, are in the Repositories, or you can add a repository, which means it requires about 4 mouse clicks to install a program. It doesn't get much easier than that. I use an 256nb ATI 9550 at my preferred resolution of 1280x1024, and it looks awesome, no problem at all. Its the only version I've gotten all my hardware to work(camera, external drives, TV Tuner, etc..).
Ubuntu might be the most popular distro there is, all those people can't be wrong. http://distrowatch.com/ Address whatever problem you're having instead of hopping around from distro to distro (although I freely admit I was guilty of that in the past, I think we all were if we're honest)
If you weren't happy with Ubuntu, I guess my next suggestion would be Fedora Core 6. I personally hate the commercial versions of Linux(Mandriva, Suse, Linspire). One commercial version that is pretty good is Xandros. There's a free version out there somewhere, but dont know a lot about it. The old version of PCLinuxOS was great(.91 i think), the new one, I couldn't get my sound or internet connection work after 4 days and gave up.
Arrrg see this stuff confuses me, "Repositories" Never heard of that word and my life and don't know how to use it. So can you please explain how I can translate rpm to deb files and get my ATI driver working in a newbie way?
...this stuff confuses me, "Repositories" Never heard of that word ... please explain how I can translate rpm to deb files and get my ATI driver working in a newbie way?
Nobody can wave a wand over you and magically transplant this stuff into your mind. I can't imagine any reason for translating .rpm files to .deb files to install an ati driver. I'm sure the ati .deb files are in Ubuntus repositories.
Ubuntu has excellent and thorough documentation on its website, and my suggestion is that you study it at least enough to figure out what a repository is.
Arrrg see this stuff confuses me, "Repositories" Never heard of that word and my life and don't know how to use it. So can you please explain how I can translate rpm to deb files and get my ATI driver working in a newbie way?
Repository(definition)... A place where things are or may be reposited, or laid up, for safety or preservation, a depository.
Basically, a repository is where many, many Ubuntu ready packages are stored, and you install them with a few clicks.
No offense, but if you immediately blasted Ubuntu, w/o really even understanding what a repository is, then the problem is you, not Ubuntu. I agree also, very very rarely is it necessary to use alien on an RPM file, and ATI's driver is not one of those rare occasions.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.