Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I'm a long time Linux user, but I've been kind of out of touch with the different distros for probably the last year and a half. I am now trying to move more into Ruby development and away from .NET development.
What do you think would be a good, fast, focused distro for developing Ruby applications. Obviously I'll be installing Ruby, Gems and Apache (and probably from source), but I have no interest in using it for any multimedia or graphics.
[edit]I would prefer to say away from KDE. I'm not a huge fan of eye candy, so a simple environment will due (fluxbox, XFCE, etc.). I would also prefer to stay away from RPM-based distros.
Thanks in advance,
~Justin
Last edited by jeelliso; 10-18-2008 at 05:10 PM.
Reason: More Details
Which part is it that your ubuntu does not satisfy? I cannot think of many other distros - other than Debian - that offer the same range of Ruby related packages.
Which part is it that your ubuntu does not satisfy? I cannot think of many other distros - other than Debian - that offer the same range of Ruby related packages.
I think I would actually prefer a Debian derivative. I've used Ubuntu almost exclusively for the last couple of years, but I think it's a little too bloated for what I want to use it for.
Ubuntu is a Debian derivative. Some have even called it Debian with drums. But yes, Debian can be less bloated - though you shouldn't count on it being so out of the box. Over the past 2 years, default Debian has increasingly come to imitate Ubuntu in terms of ease of configuration. I am sure you could get a far more streamlined box if you used something like Gentoo. I have used Gentoo in the past but gave up because it took so much time to administer and by the time I had installed all my software, it wasn't a bit faster than the "ready-made" distros. Still, for a truly dedicated box, it would make a good choice. The same could be said for Slackware. Both can provide flux or xfce(but so can *buntu, by the way, in its Xubuntu and Fluxbuntu incarnations). I would say that it depends on two factors: how trimmed does it need to be and how much time do you want to invest in it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.