LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2006, 03:55 PM   #1
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
PCLinuxOS


Is PcLinuxOS fairly new? I downloaded it, and in the process, noticed that unlike most other distributions I've tried, it has only four releases.
 
Old 04-11-2006, 04:00 PM   #2
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Not really. Its a fork of Mandrake 9.x and has some elements from the 10.x release.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 02:54 AM   #3
rjmckee
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Vidalia, GA
Distribution: PCLinuxOS
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
PCLinuxOS

This is one terrific livecd to use. All hardware HD located automatically. I did a hard disk install on an 80GB usb drive.My printer is a Brother MFC420CN printer/scanner/fax/copy unit that is attached to a local home lan (port 6 of NETGEAR router. Understanding the procedures that Brother provides for drivers and cupswrappers can take some reading time, but it works!!
PCLinuxOS got wireless working immediately. My laptop all keys/functions work as expected. Over the years of different distros Red Hat, Suse 6, 9, Gentoo, and UBUNTU I have found ease of use, good ergonomic design, very good menus especially with PCLinuxOS Control Center.
My laptop rocks now....video editing w/ avidemux2
Burning VCDs w/ k3b, audio work done with audacity.Starting with a t'test drive' with PCLinuxOS quickly convinced me to install on a large USB connected drive. Installation time ~ 25 mins (I am old), updating adding packages another 2-3 hours. I am well pleased with PCLinuxOS met all my expectations. Gentoo 2006 missed a lot of my hardware. Ubuntu also missed some. Knoppix which I thought would win in hardware identication, but PCLinuxOS provided the quickest path to getting some serious tools together in a laptop (IBM R50e laptop)
This distro uses good graphics to help in cutting away confusion.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 12:05 PM   #4
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, I should try PCLOS again, because I could just download OpenOffice, I guess; but I was not impressed, because PCLOS is the only distro I have tried (others are Mandrake, MEPIS, Xandros, Knoppix and Debian) that didn't have OpenOffice included. I know that it's big and slow, yes, but I don't mind, and I pretty much expect any good distro to have it.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 01:06 PM   #5
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
Well, I should try PCLOS again, because I could just download OpenOffice, I guess; but I was not impressed, because PCLOS is the only distro I have tried (others are Mandrake, MEPIS, Xandros, Knoppix and Debian) that didn't have OpenOffice included. I know that it's big and slow, yes, but I don't mind, and I pretty much expect any good distro to have it.
I am suprised you would not be impressed by a distro just because it missing a package that you can easily install from its repos. OOo is big and is a resource hog so many live distros don't include it in their package selection due to space restrictions. I don't think this is a major issue because usually you can install it on your own if you need it.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 01:34 PM   #6
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yes, well, there is the other overriding reason that PCLOS didn't impress me: like most distros, it would not run my wireless network. If it had, I may have been willing to ignore the omission of OO.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 05:34 PM   #7
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
Yes, well, there is the other overriding reason that PCLOS didn't impress me: like most distros, it would not run my wireless network. If it had, I may have been willing to ignore the omission of OO.
Very few wireless chipsets are supported out of the box by most Linux distros, so this is not just a problem with PCLinuxOS. Try some more distros and you will find that problems with wireless are quite common.
 
Old 04-21-2006, 09:36 PM   #8
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, I wasn't trying to connect the network out of the box. I installed NDiswrapper on this PCLinuxOS liveCD (just to see if it would work at all). It did not. It detected the network, if I recall, but made no useful connection.
 
Old 04-22-2006, 03:23 PM   #9
fair_is_fair
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 516

Rep: Reputation: 52
If PCLOS did not give you a working wireless connection then good luck with other distros.

Try the Mepis alpha release or the Ubuntu beta. Better wireless support is built in to the newer kernels.
 
Old 04-22-2006, 09:31 PM   #10
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yes, but can't you upgrade any distribution to a newer kernel?
 
Old 04-22-2006, 10:32 PM   #11
fair_is_fair
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 516

Rep: Reputation: 52
Certainly.
 
Old 04-23-2006, 11:45 AM   #12
newbiesforever
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Iowa
Distribution: Debian distro family
Posts: 2,375

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well, for some reason, the one that my network almost always works in is Xandros. (Also Mandrake, but not since I reinstalled it after exploring other distros.) With at least one other distro (I forget which one), an option to switch from eth0 (ethernet) to eth1 (my wireless network) was not even available.
 
Old 04-23-2006, 11:52 AM   #13
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
Well, for some reason, the one that my network almost always works in is Xandros. (Also Mandrake, but not since I reinstalled it after exploring other distros.) With at least one other distro (I forget which one), an option to switch from eth0 (ethernet) to eth1 (my wireless network) was not even available.
With a bit of manual configuration, you can get wireless to work on any distro. Also, you could have manually changed the network settings to use eth1 instead of eth0. I learn a lot by doing stuff manually if the GUI tools don't work (or there aren't any).
 
Old 04-23-2006, 12:15 PM   #14
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,348

Rep: Reputation: 217Reputation: 217Reputation: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbiesforever
Well, for some reason, the one that my network almost always works in is Xandros. (Also Mandrake, but not since I reinstalled it after exploring other distros.) With at least one other distro (I forget which one), an option to switch from eth0 (ethernet) to eth1 (my wireless network) was not even available.
I imagine you could also copy the kernel config file from Xandros and use it as a basis to reconfigure a new kernel in your distro of choice. Hardware support is kernel dependent, not distro dependent. Though I will admit to not having experience with wireless so perhaps there's something I'm unaware of.
 
Old 04-25-2006, 06:07 PM   #15
davecs
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Barking, Essex, Britain
Distribution: PCLinuxOS and MX-Linux
Posts: 503

Rep: Reputation: 32
A new version of PCLinuxOS has been released. This is a "Mini-me" version in advance of the main 0.93 release for people who want to install a minimum set of apps for a working system then add what they want afterwards. It may not be the best for beginners.

The kernel is a custom 2.6.15 kernel with a few 2.6.16 backports, the DRM/MDE project stuff is being integrated so Xorg will run 3D on a larger variety of cards, including good performance on some ATi cards without ATi's (not very good) drivers. If will even run 3D on nvidia cards using the xorg "nv" driver albeit slowly.

You should see some improvements in Wifi detection (though not perfect by a long chalk). Expect the full 0.93 very soon.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pclinuxos futurist Linux - Software 3 09-20-2005 01:58 PM
PCLinuxOS VeryProudOfYaLP Linux - Distributions 3 06-15-2005 04:09 PM
PCLinuxOS webwally Linux - Software 1 05-04-2005 09:37 PM
PCLinuxOS Dirty_Ink Linux - Distributions 15 06-21-2004 11:02 PM
PClinuxOS js72 Linux - Software 1 01-29-2004 07:42 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration