Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Got in a little over my head with some non mainstream distros. Like Beehive (maybe fastest distro around) www.beehive.nu
Came back to Mdk 8.1 and went with an expert install instead of the default for dummies. Formatted it ext3 instead of ext2(default) seems to be somewhat faster than before. Is this tpossible or is my mind just mushy after screwing with approx 5 or 6 distros over the past 2 days?
The Peanut was fast, but I could not get my graphics card up right. Could not find drivers for Mach 64 Rage II
Yes, ext3 is ext2 with metadata journaling and ordered data writes, also provides data journaling as well, so it will seem faster becuase it IS. If you want to quickest filesystem, then XFS is the best but currently Gentoo is one of the few that supports it. Its like ext3 but you can set the amount of allocation groups and the journalling size with the mount command under gentoo (i dont know about other distro's).
Peanut uses XFree 4.2.0 be default....some gfx cards STILL weren't ported over to 4.2.0 but were still there in 4.1.0 and earlier. Solution is to compile a new xfree86 with older revision.
Nothing is quite going to speed up your system more than either a) gutting the useless goop, which you probably did quite a bit of with an expert Mandrake install, and b) putting an append line into your boot loader's .conf file. Every Linux distro defaults to idebus=33, If your HD can do 66 or a 100, which all of them have for the past 4 years, its probably a good move to crank that. Journalling filesystems are faster, but we're talking seek read times of 1-2 ms quicker compared to asynchronous ext2. If you triple the idebus and your machine holds, then you might see it drop by half. To see how fast you're yanking data, try:
hdparm -t /dev/harddrive
and then compare it to the 6 pages worth of replies Jeremy asked for here..
Cheers,
Finegan
P.S. The only mainstream distros that aren't really suffering from the bloat are Debian and Slackware, who for opposite reasons are a few generations back on kernels, Xfrees, and a few other packages. They're also dead stable. I've got Slack 8 running on that card on a P1 200, no problems.
I think my hdds are running ATA/33 (becuase i dont know how to set grub up for ATA/100 it dont say on the Gentoo site) but my scores rock..here it goes:
bash-2.05a# hdparm -t /dev/hda5 <--- XFS Drive (maxtor in sig)
/dev/hda5:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.10 seconds = 30.48 MB/sec
bash-2.05a#
To check the current idebus speed, look in 'dmesg', it should be right after the ide initialization, but if you aven't tweaked it, its 33. I don't know grub so I can't help you, but adding an append line has to be in some recent how-to's especially with the AMD+AGP pseudo-bug. For instance, these two are taking advantage of idebus=66 and are crappy old 5400 rpm drives:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.15 seconds = 20.32 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.61 seconds = 24.56 MB/sec
Hmmm, dunno why. Again, I don't do grub, so you might have to do some poking around there. Yeah, those UDMA=100 and UDMA=66 lines are coming off of the hard drive ID'ing itself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.