LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2004, 09:27 PM   #1
Dark91
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Fedora, Mandrake, and Gentoo
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
More suitable for a Server?


Comparing Fedora Core and Gentoo which would you find more suitable of the two for a Web Server?

(Not which is used more, which would work more)
 
Old 12-15-2004, 10:29 PM   #2
mhiggins
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 140

Rep: Reputation: 15
This is not a knock on either distro but you could not have picked to more disparate platforms. Both are equally suitable It really is a matter of comfort. If you plan on exposing this box on the net you really want to be familiar with the os specific methods for securing and updating your box.

here are some pros and cons ..

Gentoo is an extremely flexible distro. You will have the ability to compile every single package on your system for you system with highly optomized compile flags. With the right options across all packages you could really improve performance. The down side is that it literally takes days to do a stage one emerge. Also stage one emerges are very error prone and difficult. I have competed 2 and attempted at least 5 and in the cases where I got a working system I wished I had done a stage 3 and rebuild what I needed. In my opinion the real advantage to using gentoo would be the ease of up keep.. when a new apache comes out just emerge and your done.

As for Fedora there are again pros and cons. Some of the good things are that it will have the host based firewall configured by default and during the install you can simply allow http / https. Another security plus is that FC3 will enable SE-Linux extensions by default which could protect against certain types of exploits that have not even been discovered. On the down side they are not always the fastest in terms up updates and if you use rpm exclusively then expect to wait a few days for the version of say apache to show up. To play the other side if you have SELinux enabled you may be protected , this does not mean you never have to update! but it could buy you the extra day. Also it is a bit of a pain to update an rpm from the FC perspective .. do they patch or bump the rev, then they have to integrate there current patch set possibly adj the build etc..

I personally would use slackware as the base os and use stow to mange the packages in the critical path, in this example apache and any supporting software.

Linux is all about choice and it up to you.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suitable distro for a 5-6 yr old PC? MKS45 Linux - Distributions 22 11-22-2004 04:29 AM
More suitable onelung02 General 3 11-19-2004 09:59 PM
Dual-cpu 450Mhx AP400 suitable as a low-cost server? melquiades Linux - General 2 11-06-2003 04:42 AM
Is Gentoo suitable for me? Comatose51 Linux - General 6 07-03-2003 04:56 PM
What would be suitable? _Mhz Linux - Distributions 1 12-25-2002 04:07 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration