LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2002, 08:43 AM   #1
javax
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Distribution: Red Hat, Cygwin
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 15
Linux vs FreeBSD which is better?


From what I've read on many OS comparison sites that BSD outclasses Linux by far. It is better at networking, security, file managment and memory management.

So what I don't understand is that if BSD is in actual fact better Linux, why has the world got their tounges wrapped around Linux and not the superior system?

I don't exactly know what is the better as I've only come to use Linux a short while and tested out FreeBSD quite some time ago. Although BSD was a bit faster in terms of speed Linux a 'bit' more easier to configure.

Anyways just wanted to know why Linux is winning over BSD? (Even though Apple have adobted it for their MacOS X)

To add to the point of where Linux is easier to configure, most of the apps available for Linux can also be run on BSD and that isn't always vice versa.

Last edited by javax; 04-18-2002 at 08:44 AM.
 
Old 04-18-2002, 01:59 PM   #2
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
well probably one thing that makes linux more popular is that it is actually easier to install, configure and use compared to freebsd.
freebsd is from what hear and read, very solid, stable and very secure out of box.. etc. i am about to install though myself, so i can get my hands dirty.... and not totally lost when it comes to it
 
Old 04-18-2002, 09:05 PM   #3
lejakl
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Southern CA
Distribution: RH 9.0
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
and isn't Linux made for the PC since day 1 whereas UNIX was made for larger server thingys and later ported to i386 systems?

but yeah tricky kid has got the idea easier to install. im running Linux (RH 7.2) atm and im going to install FreeBSD once i understand the workings of Linux (which is the next century i percieve)

Last edited by lejakl; 04-18-2002 at 09:07 PM.
 
Old 04-19-2002, 04:18 AM   #4
5amYan
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: The District
Distribution: FreeBSD, OBSD maybe Gentoo and Winblech XP
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think *BSD may be more stable.
As an install FreeBSD is cake, sysinstall is a menu based instalation reminiscent of say the linux kernel menuconfig.
You can even kinda auto partition the hd

OpenBSD is purely text based, but is well documented and straightfoward. the disk setup is very manual still.


They are both secure, OBSD more so, by default. (You ccan pick medium security for FBSD). And the installs by default are very small... I thinnk they've always been kinda workhorses. servers and fws and such. Not terribly friendly as workstations. And I think one of the reasons it's gaining popularity is linux binary compatibility, and source code availability. Alot more 'productivity' software is available for them due to linux. I guess that's kind of a way of paying back for all the things borrowed from the *BSD family.


I haven't played with netBSD yet. I want to run it on an ooold Mac, but haven't had the time to dicker with the old openfirmware...
 
Old 04-19-2002, 08:09 AM   #5
therion12
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: chicago, IL
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4_rc1
Posts: 913

Rep: Reputation: 30
It all depends on the use, FreeBSD is good for servers, and linux is tailored more for the desktop with its great software support.
 
Old 04-20-2002, 06:45 PM   #6
gene_gEnie
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: London UK
Distribution: Redhat 7.2, soon to be LFS!
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
> So what I don't understand is that if BSD is in actual fact better Linux, why has the world got their tounges wrapped around Linux and not the superior system?

What about:

If Linux is so much better than M$ Mingoes, why has the world got it's tongues wrapped around M$ Findows.


The technical superiority of a product has nothing to do with the [mass] adoption of that product by the masses.

but whadoiknow
 
Old 04-20-2002, 09:05 PM   #7
therion12
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: chicago, IL
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4_rc1
Posts: 913

Rep: Reputation: 30
becuase its learning curve is overwelming for most casual users, in which linux is a OS for more knowledgeable people who would like to learn some things.

Windows is just a os thats easy to use, and has the worlds software support.
 
Old 04-21-2002, 04:40 AM   #8
llama_meme
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: London, England
Distribution: Gentoo, FreeBSD
Posts: 590

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think it's a bit pointless to argue over which is best, especially if you haven't had a lot of experience with both of them. FreeBSD and Linux both make good servers, workstations, etc., so all this really amounts to is "anything Linux can do FreeBSD can do better", which is kinda silly.
 
Old 04-21-2002, 05:08 AM   #9
davrimo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Lincoln England UK
Distribution: Slack 8 & Mandrake 8
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Post

BSD I could not make it work for me , tried it long ago (v 2.2.5).
Think it is to do with keyboard skills and Unix experience, to much blind input and a high keyboard speed/short delay.
BSD is probably best for pro's, Linux is tolerant and friendly by comparison so it's LINUX for me.

My first post to anything anywhere
 
Old 04-21-2002, 05:17 AM   #10
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
linux is closing the gap on freebsd where performance, stability and security are concerned. someone actually did a benchmarking exercise for performance and stability and posted his findings in an article on the net... but i can't remember where according to him, the results seem to work in linux's favor.

well, i prefer linux mainly for 2 reasons. first, it's got more software packages and there is a constant drive to develop stuff for the end user. that's good for me. also, the GPL ensures that no one person can really manipulate the rest...

i think the BSD license has slightly different implications.
 
Old 04-21-2002, 03:18 PM   #11
cvig
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
I think the answer to your question is that this is a question that only you can answer. You can answer it working with both systems and seeing the differences. To me the ultimate power in FreeBSD is that one can use cvsup to get the complete up to date source code of the base system (including sendmail, sshd, gcc, etc) and rebuild it. When I have a server at a remote location this is a wonderful convinience.

Some would say that Debian has the same power plus you don't have to compile the source - just get binary packages. That is true but in my experience there are a number of reasons why I prefer the FreeBSD system over the Debian system. The Gentoo linux distribution might have some of the features of FreeBSD but of course long term stability and wide use isn't present yet so it is hard to look at.

But basically the ability to keep my servers up to date without having to go to the physical machine is a god send. In my experience the long term cost of administration (time) is vastly reduced over a comparable install of RedHat. I feel like I'm not describing the benefits of the upgrade - think of RedHat going from 6.2 to 7.2 without having to get an ISO image and go to the physical machine. That may be possible and I'd love to hear if it is but the FreeBSD system is very well refined. It is well worth reading over the handbook and poking around. If you just want a text install (no X) consider grabbing the two diskette images and doing an FTP install.

You might notice that I talk about servers and FreeBSD above but haven't mentioned workstations. On my desktop I run debian testing. I want to try FreeBSD on the desktop sometime but a lack of time and diskspace (soon to be upgraded) on my laptop have slowed me down. I'm not sold on using FreeBSD on my desktop at all. The ease of use of Debian is simply wonderful. Just because I prefer one thing for a certain task doesn't mean I'll try to use it for everything . But I definately will try it myself before I judge it.
 
Old 04-21-2002, 04:29 PM   #12
therion12
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: chicago, IL
Distribution: Gentoo 1.4_rc1
Posts: 913

Rep: Reputation: 30
I agree with you. But having used both BSD and Gentoo, i find Gentoo is better if you have the right packages set up.

FreeBSD is definatly more stable though, and debian too. Gentoo is on the bleeding edge of technology always, so thats why bugs can sneak out quickly, but rest assured there is people always working on the bugs, which are usually just minor annoyances.

Oh btw, gentoo compiles the source when you use the portage system.
 
Old 04-21-2002, 08:41 PM   #13
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
hmm... if it's bsd you want, why not openbsd then?
 
Old 04-26-2002, 08:40 AM   #14
Grim Reaper
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Distribution: Gentoo 2006.0 AMD64
Posts: 399

Rep: Reputation: 30
hrm...ive been wondering the exact same question...thanks guys...i think once ive learnt linux a bit ill check out BSD as i mostly want it for servers...ill stick with the sins of XP for my desktop
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
freeBSD better than LINUX !!! ravenstyles General 126 02-05-2005 12:35 PM
Linux 2.6 vs FreeBSD 5.3 GodSendDeath Linux - General 1 12-14-2004 11:56 PM
linux vs freebsd Ryan450 *BSD 2 08-28-2004 10:13 PM
FreeBSD vs Linux wood *BSD 3 06-15-2004 01:10 AM
Is FreeBSD better than Linux Time Lord *BSD 1 09-30-2003 09:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration