LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2003, 03:59 PM   #1
trouby
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: 15
Linux Distributions...


Hey All,

Well, I need to have a linux installation tunned to be fast secure and "clean", when I say clean, I mean, I don't want it to have thousands of libraries and files that are not required for the server to function properly (the server is a server for hosting porpuses and should mainly run apache/php/mysql).

I don't know if someone did such a research but here are my results:

RedHat -> for some reason, even when you install packages individually and you manually calculate the size of all packages together (which I had about 300MB, no GUI) it installed 800MB
(I checked that there are no dependencies required before installing, so it didn't install anything else except what it said it will)

Slackware -> Installed a real clean system, approximately 200MB installation (no GUI ofcourse)

LFS -> great, but too much work

So slackware seems to be the best choice, the main problem is that it does not support RPMS, so any updates/package installations should be done manually, same for LFS.

Maybe other distributions are cleaner and support automaitc updates, RPMS and a normal init.d directory?

Did anyone check this issue out? or nobody cares to have thousands of MBS, libraries and other files on their production systmes?


Thanks...
 
Old 10-04-2003, 04:17 PM   #2
GloVe
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 15
yup, slackware is very clean as you say, i used before RedHat 9 and SuSE 8.2, and when i installed slackware 9.1 i saw the difference after few seconds.
it's really faster, and without any garbage.
SuSE is very nice, but for a server, or a system with no GUI, i think you should take slackware.
 
Old 10-04-2003, 04:17 PM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
Moved: More suitable in the Distribution forum.

Any distro you can customize to your own needs, so basically, they call can work. Install what you need or use, remove or don't install what you won't use, etc. Its really that simple, don't rely on the default installation cause when you strip down each distro, they're all the same in the end, just packaged differently.
 
Old 10-04-2003, 04:24 PM   #4
trouby
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 59

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Trickykid, The key is 'When you strip them' they are the same,
Unfortunately, after you install RH9, with the minimal packages, you get a 800MB OS, and with lots of shared libraries, configuration files and other stuff you'll never use.

I guess it doesn't bother most of the people, but when it's a production server, it should be clean as possible and tuned as possible to do the exact things the OS should do - but it's just my opinion, you don't to agree with me about that
 
Old 10-04-2003, 04:35 PM   #5
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
If you have a large hard drive, in which most have over 20gb in most systems now, even if you do have some libs you won't use or programs installed that won't be used, that I believe isn't going to affect the performance of the machine, or have they changed something lately that it will...
 
Old 10-04-2003, 04:42 PM   #6
trouby
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 59

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Pal, you'r missing the point
It's not about the amount of physical blocks that you spend for the mass that the distributions do while installing, it's the feeling that you know exactly what each file does on your system, when we'r talking about production servers, it is important, don't you think?

The problem is that using distributions(it's not not real distrubtions actually ) like LFS is that anything that you need to upgrade or do later on is a pain in the ass, and the support is not really good, and if you did a mistake with the parameters, while compiling glibc or gcc or any other critical parts of your Linux.. then.. it can be real not funny

I would for sure go for the Slackware dist (which I use about 6 years already with great results) , the only risk (fix me if i'm wrong) is that...it's mainly built on one person, on the other side, RedHat is a big company.
 
Old 10-04-2003, 09:33 PM   #7
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
I'm missing the point, are you wanting support now or a fast system with a minimal install.

I know exactly what your saying, you don't want files that aren't going to be used. Again, I can say, any distro can do this, its just up to you to customize it and remove packages you don't see fit and install the one's you will be using.

If your going to run apache, mysql and php, well, research exactly everything they need and build your system around that....

And I've built a Redhat install/system down to about 300 megs before... So it can be done, really, it can.
 
Old 10-05-2003, 06:16 AM   #8
brew1brew
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Plano TX (north of Dallas)
Distribution: Kubuntu
Posts: 165

Rep: Reputation: 30
you might look at gentoo, it has auto update/package install features and is custom compiled for your system.
 
Old 10-06-2003, 01:10 PM   #9
trouby
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 59

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Tricky, 10x anyway :>

And ye, brew, just trying Gentoo right away :>
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux Distributions - Do we need that? Mega Man X LQ Suggestions & Feedback 7 09-08-2005 05:08 PM
Too many Linux distributions ? programmershous Linux - Distributions 74 06-25-2005 05:33 PM
Looking for two linux distributions LinuxSeeker Linux - General 6 06-05-2005 03:18 AM
Linux distributions anandt4u Linux - Newbie 4 06-03-2005 08:58 PM
Linux Distributions?! kevbeju Mandriva 2 09-28-2004 07:05 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration