Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
10-18-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Rep: 
|
Good lightweight linux distro for relatively old hardware?
Hi all LB67 here,
I have an old desktop. Asus P5RD1-VM motherboard 1gb of Ddr 333 ram. Built in graphics card. Im looking for a good fast distro.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:10 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,138
|
I am partial to Debian myself for older hardware.
Really, however, the applications you choose will have a bigger impact on performance than which Linux distro. For example as I sit here typing this, Firefox is using 400mb of RAM (compared with only about 100mb for the system at idle). This implies to me that optimizing my browsing habits by 10% (or more) would be a better "return on investment" than trying to get 100mb for the core Debian system down to 90mb. Adblock, Flashblock, Noscript, etc. will have a bigger impact on perceived performance than switching distros but continuing to use the same browser with the same settings.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:18 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
I think debian is a fine distro. Might I ask what DE you are using? And hello again.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:21 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,138
|
Hello again.  I am using mostly Openbox these days, occasionally Gnome 2.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
How do you use only a WM.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:33 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,138
|
If I understand your question correctly:
Code:
apt-get install openbox
Then you can choose it from the session options on your login screen.
Be aware that Openbox is just an empty screen, there's not much to see. 
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 04:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Sorry still getting used to how to ask questions on forums. Anyway, what machine are you running it in?
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 05:02 PM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
What's you r opinion of puppy Linux? IT runs great on my over but it's plain but I could download ice wm
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 05:08 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,138
|
I have a bunch of old computers ranging from an old Pentium 4 to an Asus EEE netbook. I've yet to find one Debian won't run on.
I am not a big fan of Puppy, personally.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2012, 05:11 PM
|
#10
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
OK. Other than Debian do you like any?
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 02:36 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 194
Rep:
|
Slackware FTW
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 06:07 AM
|
#13
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Isn't Slackware hard to install?
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 06:13 AM
|
#14
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: kerala
Distribution: linux mint 13 , redhat , ubuntu
Posts: 6
Rep: 
|
hi
in my view arch linux is good one and you can install which packages you want and you can choice which desktop environment like gnome , kde , fluxbox ,e17 etc..
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 06:14 AM
|
#15
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxnoob67
Isn't Slackware hard to install?
|
Not really. See here:
http://docs.slackware.com/slackware:install
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|