LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-12-2007, 12:38 PM   #1
BartVG
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Gent, Belgium
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
fresh install: Arch Linux or Slackware?


Two years ago I installed Slackware V10. In these two years, I've had **quite** a few problems with the installation of new software (to name a few: GIMP quits unexpectedly, gedit quits unexpectedly, QuantaPlus quited unexpectedly (gedit and Quanty being installed together with the whole system!)). I feel that I'm having a really messy system now (so many things that don't work, software installed from source, or installed with the installation scripts, or some with pkgtool). One thing that I really miss is dependency checking.

All this made me decide to install a new system. With all the software installation problems in mind (and coming from a Slackware background (and also attracted by the idea of first installing a base system and then installing extra software as you need it) I was pretty sure to try Arch Linux, but recently I read a few reviews that complained about not so stable or even buggy behaviour and the sometimes lesser quality of software packages available for Arch.
So now I'm in serious doubts: will Arch satisfy my needs or should I stay in the Slackware camp (maybe Slackware 12)?

I recently found out about Swaret, but the project seems to be down at the moment. How are the opinions about using Swaret (which apparently does have depency checking) in combination with Slackware?

P.S.: My main criteria for a distro are:
-speed (as in: being able to work without annoyingly long loading times (my Slackware system boots fairly slowly)
-stability (of the system, but also of software packages)
-not having too much trouble with the installation of new software (and also one central place that keeps track of installed software)

P.P.S.: Maybe I could have avoided a few problems by consistently installing new software with pkgtool, but this doesn't put aside the problems with apps that were installed together with the system.
 
Old 11-12-2007, 01:38 PM   #2
KrahnacK
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: /dev/volcano
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
i don't know many distro in general (the only one i've tested are gentoo and ubuntu) ...so i'm not sure to help you here, but from what i know, may i suggest Gentoo/Linux ?

gentoo is a mainly source-based distro coming with the Portage package management, which checks dependencies

i didn't tested Slackware nor Arch Linux, so i can't compare, sorry.
 
Old 11-12-2007, 05:54 PM   #3
Cogar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: It varies, but usually within 100 feet of a keyboard.
Distribution: Fedora 10, Kubuntu 8.04, Puppy 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 1,126

Rep: Reputation: 51
I ran Slackware for a short time--from version 10.2 through 11.0. When 12.0 came out, I became mildly disappointed and moved to Arch. I have not regretted it and have no plans to go back. Regarding the features you believe are important:

Speed: Arch boots and shuts down noticeably faster than Slackware (in my opinion). Perhaps 50% faster. It runs fast too.

Stability: I have not run into stability issues as a result of upgrades--including many kernel upgrades (perhaps 20). Sometimes a dependency conflict will keep you from installing something, but that is the point of having dependency checking. Once it is resolved, the installation can safely proceed. If there is an issue, you will learn about it at the official Arch forum. Their forum is quite active, and includes many developers so any problems are typically addressed quickly.

Software Installation: The Arch repositories are reasonably large. They are not as large as Debian's, but I cannot recall off the top of my head having any problems finding pretty much anything I wanted. The package manager, pacman, is excellent.

PS: The 2007.11 Arch .iso was supposed to be released last week or thereabouts, so it should be available shortly.
 
Old 11-14-2007, 02:28 PM   #4
BartVG
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Gent, Belgium
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
How does Debian compare to Slackware and Arch Linux? From what I read on the website (debian.org), this is also a stable system with thorough package management.

Is Slackware 12 notably faster than its predecessors?
 
Old 11-14-2007, 03:00 PM   #5
Cogar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: It varies, but usually within 100 feet of a keyboard.
Distribution: Fedora 10, Kubuntu 8.04, Puppy 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 1,126

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by BartVG View Post
How does Debian compare to Slackware and Arch Linux? From what I read on the website (debian.org), this is also a stable system with thorough package management.

Is Slackware 12 notably faster than its predecessors?
If I recall correctly, Debian is the distribution for which users coined the term "dependency hell." My personal experience with Debian left me with two impressions:

1. It's fast and attractive--although not as fast as Gentoo, Arch, or Slackware.
2. The installer is one of the worst out there. I have installed it three times on two machines and not one install went properly. An example of something that went wrong would be that the GNOME menu did not get installed due to some conflict (if you select the GNOME desktop environment). The fix is simple, but a user should not have to put up with stuff like that.

Regarding the speed of Slackware 12, my impression is that it was about the same as 11.
 
Old 11-14-2007, 05:29 PM   #6
BartVG
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Gent, Belgium
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
"dependency hell" is actually the term I would use to describe my Slackware system (Slackware 9 by the way). It's because so many people are positive about Slack that I still believe in it. But, as I stated in the starting post, the problems are probably due to not having chosen one standard way of installing software on my computer. At the moment, I'm considering Slackware 12 with slapt-get as package manager.

Gentoo is not an option (at this moment in my linux quest) because I'm not very eager to compiling *everything* from source.
 
Old 11-14-2007, 07:50 PM   #7
chilebiker
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Lake District, Chile
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 17
"Dependency hell" - you'll forget that term immediately once you're used to pacman. Arch's package manager is ONE of several reasons I like that distribution so much!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware hangs after fresh install z31200n3 Slackware 11 04-11-2007 09:08 PM
Fresh Slackware 10.2 install... JesusFreak84 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 12-11-2005 04:09 PM
Fresh install of Slackware will not load X whited Linux - Hardware 4 06-04-2005 04:16 PM
no sound on a fresh install slackware 10... kublador Slackware 13 08-29-2004 10:05 PM
Getting 2.6.7 with slackware on a fresh install equilibrium Slackware 6 07-13-2004 05:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration