LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2014, 07:24 AM   #1
iwtbf
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 1
Finding a suitable distribution for old Asus Eee 900


A friend gave me a good old Asus Eee 900 with 16 gb hdd (but with RAM upgraded from 1gb to 2gb) with a broken and cluttered Xandros install.

I'm looking for for a somewhat lightweight and minimalistic distribution which might work reasonable good on a Eee 900 2014. Or is this simply impossible? Is it just too old?

I've been using debian and debian-like distros for the most part but I'm very open to trying out other distinct branches.

The idea is to use it for surfing, writing, and hanging out on IRC. Nothing too fancy in other words.

Any suggestions would be highly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Old 03-11-2014, 07:29 AM   #2
pierre2
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Perth, AU
Distribution: LinuxMint
Posts: 388
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 88
you didn't say what the CPU is ..
- the hdd would be nicer if it was about 40Gb,

but try anti-X
antix.mepis.org

mainly, because of the size of the hdd.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-11-2014, 07:35 AM   #3
iwtbf
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre2 View Post
you didn't say what the CPU is ..
- the hdd would be nicer if it was about 40Gb,

but try anti-X
antix.mepis.org

mainly, because of the size of the hdd.

Oh, sorry about that. It's a Celeron M ULV Processor 900MHz.

Thanks, I will check out anti-X
 
Old 03-11-2014, 11:07 AM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
antiX should run well, I use Slackware on my EeePC 701. Actually anything should run well on that machine, if you don't use the heavy environments (KDE, Gnome, Unity) and rather go for something lightweight (XFCE, LXDE/LXQt, Enlightenment or some of the other WMs).
 
Old 03-11-2014, 01:03 PM   #5
DavidMcCann
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Debian
Posts: 6,140

Rep: Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314Reputation: 2314
The Celeron M may not have pae: run
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep pae
to see if it does. If it doesn't, then AntiX and Bodhi will still work. Here are my reviews:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7
 
Old 03-12-2014, 09:23 AM   #6
sgosnell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Baja Oklahoma
Distribution: Debian Stable and Unstable
Posts: 1,943

Rep: Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542Reputation: 542
I run standard Debian with Xfce on my 900. Works fine, no noticeable lags, no problems. You may want to think about using an SD card or external USB drive for holding /home or even the rootfs, since the internal SSD isn't that big, or that fast. I've been running from a USB HDD, and while it's slower to boot, it runs fine once it finishes booting.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 09:28 PM   #7
maples
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Jessie
Posts: 814

Rep: Reputation: 265Reputation: 265Reputation: 265
I'm writing this on an Eee PC 901 with Lubuntu 13.04 installed. Mine has an Atom processor and 2 GB RAM. IDK how the Atom compares to the Celeron. I just have it installed on the internal drives, nothing in the card reader, and it runs fine (although a bit slow).

From power on to my homepage in Firefox is under a minute (estimated, I haven't actually timed it). FF tends to freeze every now and then (especially on opening a new tab), but give it 10 seconds and it will be back. LibreOffice works well, from what I've used of it. I haven't done much, just editing a doocument or two, but it runs fast enough for me.

The Lubuntu software center is slow, but useable. Just expect to wait a few seconds after almost every click.

I keep a CPU temperature icon in the menu bar along the bottom because I hear the fan spin up a lot. It doesn't seem to like flash at all, I've pushed it up to 65C just by atching videos on Youtube. Right now, I've been browsing this forum for about 20 minutes, and the temp is at 48C.

Random application launch times (after browsing this forum for 20 mins):
LibreOffice Writer: <7 seconds
Audacious: <3 seconds
Audacity: <5 seconds
Lubuuntu Software Center: <7 seconds

I hope this helps you make your decision. Good luck!
 
Old 03-18-2014, 10:14 PM   #8
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,111
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474Reputation: 3474
I ran a eee900 for a long while before switching to M&A Atom Netbook which is a toughbook version of a eeepc 900.

If really interested.

http://antix.freeforums.org/antix-11...hed-t3104.html

There is a later one though that borrows from mine for 12

http://antix.freeforums.org/antix-12...tep-t3868.html

The latest final is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/anti...al/antiX-13.2/

go for the

Quote:
antiX-13.2_386-full.iso 2013-11-04 723.5 MB
I sold my 2 eeepcs (900 & 701SD) to pay for the M&A so I don't have them anymore. Mine ran good on the 32bit Full isos. 13.2 is now way better than when I ran it back in the 8.0 days. More features.
Pick Debian Stable repos when the choice is offered. (or testing or unstable/sid, up to you)

For everything else

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFW...KlXW5uE9opXukQ

See. That is the kinda support we give to a new AntiX user.

Last edited by rokytnji; 03-18-2014 at 10:21 PM.
 
Old 03-19-2014, 04:36 PM   #9
propofol
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Seattle
Distribution: Debian Wheezy & Jessie; Ubuntu
Posts: 334

Rep: Reputation: 60
Debian Wheezy worked "out of the box". I did upgrade the ssd to 64G. I have since replaced mine with a Vivobook x202e & installed Ubermix (http://www.ubermix.org/) for my daughter to play with.

Regards,
Stefan
 
Old 04-08-2014, 10:38 AM   #10
battleship
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 20
Pretty much anything will work yuo would probably need about 3 gigs of swap, use the rest of the hdd for your root partition. and use an ssd card for a storage partition. Ive seen 32 gig cards on sale for unde 25$. If you DL alot of movies or big files Maybe Go with a 64 or 128. You really don't need a socalled lightweight distro for that machine. If you like Slackware for example try Vector or Zenwalk Not trully lightweight but the install is smaller than a Slackware install. It will give you a little more room to DL large files and simply move them to your storage partition.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 08:45 PM   #11
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Might want to sdteer clear of some of the more bloated distros, like Ubuntu- but some of the lighter distros, like Crunchbang [it's like a minimalist Debian, with the Openbox window-manager instead of a desktop environment) or the already-mentioned AntiX (also Debian based, with a choice of several different window-managers instead of a resource-hogging DE) will FLY on the machine.
 
Old 04-16-2014, 03:34 AM   #12
iwtbf
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: cybernetic space
Distribution: debian
Posts: 42

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
Hey all! Thank you so much for all your wonderful tips. I played around a little and found that many distros proved to work out really well, to my surprise. Anyway, it ended up staying with Bodhi Linux. It works really well, looks good and I kind of like it for the lulz also.

Thanks again. Now I'm going to try to get antiX to work on my acer aspire 1413lc (it doesn't even have wifi )
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asus EEE 900 wireless authentication squigglytail Linux - Networking 2 09-03-2009 10:26 AM
lfs on the asus eee (900 for me) jason87x Linux - Software 1 07-01-2009 09:48 PM
lfs on the asus eee (900 for me) jason87x Linux From Scratch 0 06-21-2009 09:55 PM
Trouble with wireless on ASUS EEE 900 ywnielsen Linux - Newbie 4 12-16-2008 08:23 AM
ASUS Eee 701 and 900...which one to buy? vous Linux - Hardware 10 06-11-2008 03:01 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration