Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-28-2004, 01:02 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: 103 East 1 North
Distribution: Gentoo, Suse 9.1
Posts: 12
Rep:
|
distro for a Pentium MMX laptop
hi all,
I have read a couple of great threads on the above topic but I thought it would be better to get confirmation with the experts here.
I'm looking for a nice and very updated distro that will work on a Pentium MMX 266, 64MB RAM, 4GB harddisk laptop. This one is for an old sturdy Toshiba Satellite 330CDT machine. Currently it's on Win2K but no matter how much you tweak, it's still damn inefficient. I've given up on Windozzzzz.
It's currently connected to the internet via a 3COM 802.11b wireless card (it's an old card probably manufactured in the year 1999). No ethernet card on this laptop. Good thing is that the CD still works. Which kernel would be good for this sort of config?
The laptop is meant to be used by someone who doens't know what a distro or linux means to her. So I'm thinking of easy to use GUI apps like XFCE4, Abiword 2, XMMS or CPlay, Firefox (or Dillo - some sites are pretty badly rendered but fast!) and packages that are easy to install/emerge/pacman-ize.  Just trying to keep the interfaces similar to W2K or Win98. Don't want a rude shock like Command line or Fluxbox/Openbox architecture stuffs.
I've worked with Gentoo. Built one from Stage 1 on an Celeron 466Mhz and 128MB RAM machine. Took a long time to complete. I probably use Gentoo stage 3 as a last choice for this laptop.
I read about Arch linux but it's optimized for i686 or Pentium II or higher. Pentium MMX is probably a bit ancient for this distro. Is Pentium MMX = i586?? What do you guys think?
Vector linux 4.0 is something i'm considering - but the packages are not updated (i think). Heard that Vector SOHO 4.0 takes up too much resources and will not be released in the near future. RC2 is not even out there yet.
Can't wait to hear your opinions! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 02:55 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Switzerland (Europe)
Distribution: OpenSuSE, RedHat, Knoppix, IRIX + MacOSX
Posts: 198
Rep:
|
You have luck with 64MB, most modern Distros need them for the Installation-RAMdisk !
My favorite is Knoppix: A live System, running from CD without installation, so you can test it on your laptop. And you can try Kernel 2.4 and 2.6.
But with a P1 MMX don't expect too much performance... (You've been warned ;-)
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 03:37 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: ..where no life dwells..
Distribution: RH,FC/SuSE/Debian/HPUX/OSX
Posts: 509
Rep:
|
Hi!
an updated distro with gui on a MMX 266?! uuuh......have fun! ;-)
interesting topic....
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 06:38 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216
Rep:
|
How about Cobind? Based on Fedora, so it should work on i586, comes ith XFce4 as the only desktop, Firefox for browsing... follows the 'one app in each category' rule so poor user does not have to suffer that hell of having to make choices  Seriously though, it might be just the ticket.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 10:06 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 11:21 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: 103 East 1 North
Distribution: Gentoo, Suse 9.1
Posts: 12
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi Ferrix: Sounds like a good distro (Cobind). Concern is that the website says only P2 machines and above are supported. Not sure if they have all the hardware support for this Toshiba laptop. I will it give a try nevertheless.
Megamieusel: I did try Vector Linux Live CD on that laptop. It works just fine but i want to get new packages and probably more updated stuffs like Abiword 2. I believe VL 4.0 only provides Abiword 1.0.3. Can VL 4.0 do that with TGZ package management? I haven't tried that yet.
I like the quick and easy way to update the packages like what Gentoo 'portage' did. It took care of all the dependencies. I had a lot of issues with dependencies when i first used Suse 9.0 and RedHat (when i took the first step to try out linux and that got me entangled until now) Managing dependencies are a headache. All I wanted was the application, but no .. you got a bunch of libraries that you need to compile and test.
Any more great distros out there?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 01:33 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Can VL 4.0 do that with TGZ package management? I haven't tried that yet.
|
Yes , it can.
VL4.0 is fully compatible with Slackware 9.0 packages. Slack 9.1 and later packages may or may not work ; it's gamble with these.
Btw-Veckpkg is actually "installpkg" , hidden in a script. 
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 01:44 PM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: 103 East 1 North
Distribution: Gentoo, Suse 9.1
Posts: 12
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I was thinking of trying out Slackware 10 for the laptop. What do you guys think? Is it easy to customize so that only small packages like XFCE or Abiword are installed, leaving out bloated packages like KDE and GNOME?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2004, 05:57 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Ultima, Blag, KateOS, PCLinuxOS, Frugalware
Posts: 216
Rep:
|
Bummer about Cobind - I didn't notice that bit on their website, knowing they were based on Fedora I just assumed they would be OK for Pentium I... Well I guess you'll have to do it the hard way: take a full general-purpose distro, and install only the parts you want. Sure, you can do that with Slack - you can pick exactly the packages you want to install, and nothing else... it's just a question of how much time you've got on your hands  Or else, you could install just the base system, no GUI - then use Swaret to get the desktop bits you want. It will be probably easier this way.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|