LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2006, 10:44 AM   #1
mEo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Choosing My Distribution


Hi,

I am currently using Suse 10. I am fairly happy with it, but not 100% and I want to try another one.

Here are some of the key features I would like:
- Fairly well known (major programs have a version for it)
- Allows Firefox (preferably as its main browser)
- Looks like windows (with the bottom bar and a 'start' menu. KDE has this kinda look in a way. I don't mean the colours, I mean the start button kind of thing in the bottom left, programs appear on the taskbar. Not one in the top corner. I don't mind if it can be 'themed' to have that style.
- Fast
- Supports OpenOffice
- Wireless capabilities
- Easy to install (suse was great, i hardly had to do anything)
- Easy to update and configure installed programs
- Easy to install programs and rpms (i've heard that redhat is good for that. Suse is alright at installing RPMs, but i hate having to do the ./configure thing. I know all distrib have to do that, but surely there is an easier way
- User friendly. I am new to linux, I don't want to have to discover everything again. I think using suse has been a good intro.

If there is one that kind of fits what I'm after, please say it! I will download it and try.

If you think Suse is my best approach, then tell me how I can improve what I've got (There are pointers above suse isn't good with). Such as should I use gnome instead of KDE?

Thanks,
 
Old 05-17-2006, 11:53 AM   #2
mcteagle
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Distribution: Ubuntu (x86 & AMD64)
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 15
Are you using YaST to configure and install applications? I've found that it doesn't get much better than that for managing packages. Apart from that, perhaps you could be more specific in your list on where you feel Suse isn't covering your needs.
 
Old 05-17-2006, 11:56 AM   #3
weibullguy
ReliaFree Maintainer
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Distribution: Slackware-current, Cross Linux from Scratch, Gentoo
Posts: 2,750
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 238Reputation: 238Reputation: 238
I've used or currently use Fedora, Debian, Gentoo, and Scientific. My opinions/experiences based on the distros I've tried:

Quote:
Fairly well known (major programs have a version for it)
Fedora, Debian, Gentoo are well known. I've also tried Scientific Linux, not so well known but Red Hat based. Let's eliminate Scientific.
Quote:
Allows Firefox (preferably as its main browser)
I used Firefox in Fedora, Debian, and Gentoo. It's my default in Fedora and Debian.
Quote:
Looks like windows (with the bottom bar and a 'start' menu. KDE has this kinda look in a way. I don't mean the colours, I mean the start button kind of thing in the bottom left, programs appear on the taskbar. Not one in the top corner. I don't mind if it can be 'themed' to have that style.
Both KDE and GNOME allow you to reposition the task bar. Both can be used in Fedora, Debian, or Gentoo.
Quote:
Fast
This is relative. I'm not unhappy with the performance of Fedora, Debian, or Gentoo.
Quote:
Supports OpenOffice
Let's see...Fedora, Debian, Gentoo.
Quote:
Wireless capabilities
Sorry, don't use it. I'd guess Fedora, Debian, and Gentoo all have wireless capabilities.
Quote:
Easy to install (suse was great, i hardly had to do anything)
Once again, this is relative. I thought Fedora, Debian, and Gentoo were all easy to install. Others may disagree. Twisting my arm, I would say Gentoo was the most difficult, then Debian, then Fedora. Since you compile everything in Gentoo, let's throw it out.
Quote:
Easy to update and configure installed programs
Fedora -> yum update
Debian -> apt-get upgrade
Also, both have GUI package managers so you don't have to use the CLI.
Quote:
Easy to install programs and rpms
Fedora -> yum install 'program'
Debian -> apt-get install 'program'
This is assuming that when you say rpm, you mean precompiled packages. Debian can, but doesn't by default, use rpm packages. However, there are more packages available for Debian.

Quote:
User friendly. I am new to linux, I don't want to have to discover everything again. I think using suse has been a good intro.
Never used SuSE, so I really can't make a comparison. I started using Fedora, then tried Debian. Things are different between distros. You'll need to get used to them, but we're not talking about months or even weeks.

Go here and shop around.
 
Old 05-17-2006, 03:25 PM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
Moved: This thread is more suitable in Linux-Distributions and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
 
Old 05-17-2006, 06:33 PM   #5
mEo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 17

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for that, I will probably try fedora and debian at some point
 
Old 05-17-2006, 11:17 PM   #6
halflife28
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Kubuntu would be your best bet. I have tried RPM based distros and IMO they suck. Debs are far more superior than RPMs.
 
Old 05-28-2006, 10:37 AM   #7
davecs
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Dagenham, Essex, Britain
Distribution: PCLinuxOS
Posts: 485

Rep: Reputation: 31
I don't agree that debs are better or worse than rpms, it depends on the packager, and how well dependencies are taken care of.

PCLinuxOS seems to meet your requirements, it's a KDE-centric distro, with the new convert from Windows in mind. It has a control centre, so you don't have to do too much by text-edit, and many wifi interfaces are found and setup automatically (though of course not all).

It is strong on Multimedia etc. It has a great help community at its site, where we have two fundamental rules: 1 - Nobody must have a pop at new linux users and 2 - don't bash other distros.
 
Old 05-28-2006, 05:40 PM   #8
[Rado]
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Ubuntu or Kubuntu are a solid choice as well
 
Old 05-29-2006, 01:52 AM   #9
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,248

Rep: Reputation: 46
Pretty much any of the major distros will fill your stated requirements including SuSE. Take a look at Mepis, it may be what you are looking for.
 
Old 05-29-2006, 02:50 AM   #10
ehawk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257

Rep: Reputation: 48
PCLinuxOS....even simpler than SimplyMepis, which could be choice #2
 
Old 06-05-2006, 10:13 AM   #11
Nailgun
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: suse9.3/LOST!
Posts: 39

Rep: Reputation: 15
Pclinux is what replaced my Suse install. I am able to play 5 dvd movies at the same time and use Firefox too.. I loaded the PCgamer version and that came with a ton of 3d games too. The pacage management is by far and away easier to use, yast was a pain.
To load the dvd library was one click.

I found the best way to use Suse was to format it off my drive.

Good luck.
 
Old 06-05-2006, 10:41 AM   #12
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
The best solution is to take a look at distrowatch and try a few distros (probably the ones in the top 10) and then stick with the one you like. Distrowatch has a list of features in each distro and the versions of packages so you should be able to tell whether it is a potential candidate for you. The problem with your question is that usually it invites replies which are biased towards a users favourite distro/s as shown in statements such as
Quote:
Kubuntu would be your best bet. I have tried RPM based distros and IMO they suck. Debs are far more superior than RPMs.
No doubt Kubuntu is good, but the rest of the stemement is questionable since a distros performance usually has nothing to do with the type of packages it uses.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choosing a right distribution..help.. fadeone Linux - Distributions 5 02-14-2006 05:26 AM
i need help choosing distribution! redsector Linux - Newbie 3 05-13-2005 11:49 AM
choosing distribution for old PC whereverjustice Linux - Newbie 9 04-26-2005 11:32 PM
getting started: choosing a distribution ArloLeach Linux - Enterprise 16 07-04-2004 09:14 PM
Need Help Choosing Distribution terdmonkey18 Linux - Software 4 09-20-2003 10:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration