Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I've run an old 486 with 16MB of RAM. You definetly won't be able to run GNOME or KDE. Maybe something light like fluxbox might wok but the only graphical web brower that might work is dillo.
If you just want to run Apache you won't need the GUI. I don't know if the 9.1 installation routine has a minimum RAM requirement (some distros do). If it won't install, go back to 7.1 or try Debian Woody or an old version of Red Hat.
Originally posted by darthtux If you just want to run Apache you won't need the GUI. I don't know if the 9.1 installation routine has a minimum RAM requirement (some distros do). If it won't install, go back to 7.1 or try Debian Woody or an old version of Red Hat.
Before I sent it to the recycler, I installed Slack 8.1 on my old-school 1996 Pentium 133, with a screaming 64Mg of RAM and a 1.6G drive. As others have said it can't cope with a fancy GUI but you should be able to install it and run it. -- J.W.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.