Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by acid_kewpie did you try searching this site before posting? this is asked EVERY day.... please see our review site for info abuot different distros:
as for repartitioning though... you can use the existing partitions again, no problem.
agreed, every hour almost, a new post about this comes along.
i'd recommend ubuntu. a nice, clean, gnome-based desktop distro, using debian as its base system. easy to install, not bogged down with useless, apps, its the bare minimum without being bare.
Okay, from the research I've done, it sounds like Slackware is closer to what I'm looking for, but I hear it's hard to install. Is freeBSD similar to unix? I'm not too interested in the GUI like RedHat has, I want to learn as well as program.
FreeBSD is a unix variant, so if you got some Unix experience you should be quite comfortable with it. SLackware isn't hard to install, the installer is text based but quite user frindly in my opinion because there is very little manual configuration of files.
Thanks for ur quick reply.. what is the differences between freeBSD and slackware? My biggest concern is ease of connecting to the net w/high speed modem as i had tons of problems setting up RH's internet connection
I've not used FreeBSD much so I can't give you detailed differences. You may wanna take a look at distrowatch because they have a listing of various Linux distros and BSD's.
The difference between slackware and FreeBSD is that Slackware is linux and FreeBSD is BSD.. i.e. - not linux..
FreeBSD, as well as OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.. are based on the 4.4BSDlite UNIX from Berkely... FreeBSD is great.. it's got excellent performance, stability, security, and almost 12,000 programs in ports for you to look through...
It feels right at home as a workstation, dekstop, server, even on a notebook it works great...
Slackware is the most 'unix-like' linux distro because of it's lack of GUI configuration tools.. (which I like)..
I think you'd be happy with whichever you choose...
if you want an easy to install slackware, i highly recommend vector linux. you can have it installed in about 15 minutes. it is the easiest distro ive ever installed.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.