LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2005, 08:45 AM   #1
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Best distro for fast performance on PIII


Hi,

Looking for help to choose a distro for the kids and me (all newbies).

As i am planning to put this on older hardware can anyone recommend a distro that will be easy to install, fast performance and easy to use.

I have read loads of reviews on different distro's and its getting to confusing.

For instance, will I be better off with something like DSL / Puppy or Mandriva 2006, which I found to be slow on my P3 800.

Any help much appreciated!

 
Old 11-23-2005, 08:56 AM   #2
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 31
Well...

I use Slackware Linux. Pentium IIIs aren't really that slow, they can run any distro in existence. It's more of an issue of RAM. Also, you would be best off using an optimized distro like Arch Linux.

DSL is way past overkill on a pentium3, you could even run the most intenseive DEs in existence on a pentium3.
 
Old 11-23-2005, 09:32 AM   #3
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
you have to determine your cost factor of speed vs. functionality/user-friendliness.

As was stated, RAM is more of an issue than it being a Pentium III (and what speed PIII??). Arch Linux is i686 optimized and I have found it to be extremely fast on anything I've run it on.. however, it's not aimed at totaly newbies either..

Slackware might be your best option with something like the XFCE4 desktop.. Debian may also be a good choice because of their massive collection of packages.

You may also have no problem at all running KDE or GNOME... please let us know how much RAM you have in the system...
 
Old 11-23-2005, 10:42 AM   #4
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
thanks for the help.

In answer to your question system is as follows:

P3 800mhz
256mb pc133 sdram
Nvidia MX40 32mb
20GB Seagate 7200rpm
 
Old 11-23-2005, 11:08 AM   #5
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 31
YOu should be able to run anything on that. I used to have 266mb of ram before i upgraded, and i could even run Gnome at full speeds.(with swapping ocationaly)
 
Old 11-23-2005, 11:45 AM   #6
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
thats what I thought.

Tried Mandriva 2006 on spare hard drive, found it slower than Win XP.

I was hoping to get a performance improvement over XP, which is why I raised the question.

Downloading Mepis at present, thought it might be worth a try! Like the sound of Slackware, but everyone says you need to use the command line on occasion. Frightens me somewhat as I do not understand command lines at all!

Whats your view
 
Old 11-23-2005, 11:53 AM   #7
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
slackware is excellent.. yes, you do need to use command line for some things.. but it's much better to jump in and give it a try...

Finding it slower than XP is not surprising.. KDE and Gnome desktops are larger than the explorer.exe desktop.. but with a lot more functionality..

You would probably find XFCE4 very fast with enough functionality for your needs.

Back to slackware.. it's an easy install... just read the instructions on the screen.. and choose "everything" on the install.. at the end it will give you an option for the default desktop environment you want... KDE, XFCE, Fluxbox, Blackbox, FVWM, etc.. as I said, I suggest giving XFCE a shot..

By default, it won't boot right up to a graphical login.. but it's as easy as "username" "password" "startx" and it will jump into the graphical environment for you.
 
Old 11-23-2005, 12:01 PM   #8
ssfrstlstnm
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: debian etch
Posts: 402

Rep: Reputation: 30
I just set up a pc for my daughter who is 7. I used debian with gnome. It's great, although depending on your hardware debian can be a little hard to set up. You may want to look at edubuntu. Its more oriented toward children and is simple to install. I went for debian because of the huge package selection.
 
Old 11-23-2005, 12:17 PM   #9
Kerrysl
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora 8, (previously FC6, FC5, FC4, FC3, & Mandrake 10)
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
I am running an AMD Duron 950MHz, with 512MB Ram, and MX200 Nvidia graphics card. All of this is pretty ancient stuff.

I run Fedora Core 3 with KDE, with an extensive list of images for randomly changing wallpapers, and translucent effects on menus and window title bars.
All of this works at an acceptably fast pace.
The only slow downs I notice is initial boot time is longer than Win2K, some programs (Firefox, Evolution, etc) take longer to start up than equivalents in Windows. Mind you Firefox start up is about the same in both.

FC3 (and FC4) is an easy install, with just about everything being graphical. My kids 4 & 8 have no trouble playing several Linux games, and indeed booting into Windows for other games. My 4 year old only needs someone to type in the passwords.

I agree with the others if you want to spend only a little bit of money, and upgrade of your ram to 512MB would provide you with a huge performance improvement in both Linux and Windows. An extra 256MB stick would only cost you about $40 or less.
 
Old 11-23-2005, 01:09 PM   #10
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
many thanks for all of your comments.

Probably will upgrade to 512mb

I have heard that XFCE is faster, but will this affect what applications can be used?
 
Old 11-23-2005, 02:08 PM   #11
ssfrstlstnm
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: debian etch
Posts: 402

Rep: Reputation: 30
You can use all the same apps with a light window manager like XFCE. It is faster than KDE and Gnome because it doesn't have all of the bells and whistles that they have. If you are new to linux, you may want to stick with KDE or Gnome to start off with because things will be easier to configure. I haven't used XFCE, but I know that much of the configuration with fluxbox (similar to XFCE) is by hand which can be frustrating for newbies.
 
Old 11-23-2005, 02:42 PM   #12
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
not true.. almost all configuration in xfce is with the GUI interface, UNLIKE fluxbox... which i prefer..

Slackware does not include gnome.. but does include KDE.. KDE is the most similar to the windows desktop.. xfce is a little differently laid out.. but still is very intuitive..
 
Old 11-23-2005, 03:32 PM   #13
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
OK this is good.

I will take the plunge and download slackware, configure for XFCE and see how it goes.

I am planning to set up 3 Linux machines (one for each of the kids), so might install different distro's on all 3 and compare ease of use/functionality versus speed.
 
Old 11-24-2005, 02:46 AM   #14
Kerrysl
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Fedora 8, (previously FC6, FC5, FC4, FC3, & Mandrake 10)
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
If you are doing that, then please report back your findings as that would be useful information for others as well.
 
Old 11-24-2005, 02:51 AM   #15
leeh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Distribution: Tried Mandriva 2006
Posts: 16
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
will do.

should be getting the computers in a couple of weeks.

Once set up I will give feedback.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need: fast distro for old computer. Nathan1993 Linux - General 6 09-23-2005 06:08 PM
Fast Distro? aggrosk8rdude Linux - Laptop and Netbook 5 06-28-2005 06:04 PM
How fast does your Linux distro boot? Rayen16 General 3 05-15-2005 05:04 PM
Concerning Best Distro/GUI for a Gateway PIII 667MHz bad_ronald Linux - Newbie 9 08-21-2004 12:43 AM
Linux - Mobile PIII performance Lazlo Linux - General 0 03-15-2002 05:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration