Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
No, really. How would you compare these 2 popular distros? If I am going to install a Linux distro (over BSD) these 2 would probably the 2 I would consider.
Well, I consider ArchLinux to be "Slackware++". Its got the compatability and simplicity of Slackware, but with amazing package management, more up to date packages, and i686 compilation.
Its also got a nice community. I find it a lot friendlier than Slackware's. Slackware users tend to me umm....religious about it.
Coming from (free?)BSD you will probably appreciate the Arch package manager pacman. You can use it to update your system and install/uninstall (binaries) with dependencies. If you prefer building from source pacman has a sibling called makepkg which you can use to easily generate customized packages. It's all pretty simple and transparent. Perhaps similar tools exist for slackware? I honestly don't know.
Slackware has a much bigger user base and has been around for a decade or so. This might count for something. While my experience with Arch (as a desktop system) has been good and solid it is still 0,5...
I'd like to agree with everyone so far - Arch is probably better of the two: the same simplicity and transparency that makes Slackware great, but Pacman is bonus for package management. There are only two reasons I can think of for chosing Slackware over Arch: one, if you want to run it on architecture other than i686. Two, if you really need any packages covered by Slackware but absent in Arch.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.