Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
12-01-2005, 01:37 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Iran
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 16
Rep:
|
A Lite Linux
Dear all,
i have a system with the following spec and i need a distro that runs fast and well with it.
can u help me with that?
pentium 90Mhz
ram 16mb
hdd 700mb
can i use the X enviroment in such box or not?
what is the most suitable distro for it?
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 02:00 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu and Knoppix
Posts: 101
Rep:
|
Im no expert, but DSL might be a good option http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 02:22 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Houston Texas
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 379
Rep:
|
I think X needs quite a bit of ram. I know I have a server 133 mhz 32 mb ram and it will install X, but its slow as all hell. Not worth it for me. Oh, I had Debian Sarge on it (500-600 mb clean install I believe). I just stuck with command line and it was fine. Bootup process takes like 5+ minutes though.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 04:08 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Vector Linux 5.1 Std., Vector Linux 5.8 Std., Win2k, XP, OS X (10.4 & 10.5)
Posts: 344
Rep:
|
I would recommend Vector Linux 5.1 Standard
or an older version of Slackware or even an older version of Vector
For windows managers I would suggest IceWM with EmelFM file manager.
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 01:56 AM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu Breezy & DSL
Posts: 12
Rep:
|
Hi!
One vote more for DSL. Just check the bootcodes, there is a kind of 'lowram' option. I think, you should do a HD install with it. There is also DeLi Linux ( http://www.delilinux.de) as a distro for old computers.
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 04:49 AM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Iran
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 16
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thank you all,
but about vector linux: my hdd is 700mb and my ram is 16mb does it work fine?
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 05:28 AM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu Breezy & DSL
Posts: 12
Rep:
|
Hi!
Don't think so... You need a 200 MHz P1-MMX with 64 MB RAM for the newer versions...
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 10:13 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian and FreeBSD
Posts: 243
Rep:
|
VEctor linux is weird to install. It's said to be light, but the installer doesn't let you chose anything and it unpacks 2 compressed files of about more then a GB. And my old machine didn't have that much.
Slackware runs very good tho. It boots fast, maybe in 1 minute. I'd advice slack for that machine.
Damn small linux might be your best option if you want X.
But I prefer slackware with console apps + screen as "window manager".
Debian might be good too. But it boots slower. But apt is definatly a good advantage.
By the way, here's a good article about someone running debian on a computer like yours with X: http://www.pycs.net/lateral/stories/4.html
Deli linux is indeed also a linux for older hardware. You could try it. I found it booted extremely fast on my 50mhz 486 with 20mb ram (for sure under a minute). But it doesn't have many packages, it's supposed to work with slack 7.1 packages but here it didn't. It should be good to look into deli linux tho, as I didn't try to much to get it to my liking.
greetz
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 11:11 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Distribution: osx86, Ubuntu, VLOS
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
I have a celeron 635mhz 256mb intel i810  what u guys recommend
Vector Linux = dont like
DSL = dont like
either =\
Last edited by RobNyc; 12-02-2005 at 11:15 PM.
|
|
|
|
12-04-2005, 09:59 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: England, South East
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 358
Rep:
|
how about zenwalk?, its a 477MB iso with the xfce 4.2.3 de, the new 2.0.1 release has just been released check it out at www.zenwalk.org.
|
|
|
|
12-06-2005, 04:52 AM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu Breezy & DSL
Posts: 12
Rep:
|
@RobNyc:
Perhaps Ubuntu?
I tried it on my home PC (600MHz, 192MB RAM) and found it OK.
Also, Debian can be a good solution.
Greetings!
Robert
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 08:58 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Distribution: osx86, Ubuntu, VLOS
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
i've tried Ubuntu hmmmmmm
no comment =\
Right now my Celeron running DesktopBSD uptime 3days
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 09:24 PM
|
#13
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 16
Rep:
|
haven't tried it...
try TINY Linux it doesn't look like its GUI, but it is designed to run on i486 or above, with 16 Mb of ram. read the FAQ on their website.
I'm a  , but not for long...
|
|
|
|
12-17-2005, 02:24 AM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: NYC, USA
Distribution: osx86, Ubuntu, VLOS
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
So far.. I tried Frugalware on both pcs (Slow/Fast) runs great the fastest distro.
Ran pCBSD/desktopbsd they both are blazin fast, but pcbsd faster cuz of freebsd 6.0 but dbsd prefer to use its more a pure freebsd 
Arch / Underground well. (Frugalware runs faster than Arch even using kde 3.5 or gnome)
Gentoo u know the deal 
Arcane (old h3knix) running on celeron .. w/ e17 so nice
STX Linux also running on celeron "Slackware" based but not feelin it so much anymore
Mutagenix .. waiting
NExenta waiting
Ubuntu out of the list too slow
Kanotix .. best debian
PCLOS doesnt work on my celeron cuz of the old intel i810 card but works good on p4
|
|
|
|
12-20-2005, 02:51 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: SuSE 11.0
Posts: 171
Rep:
|
Again VECTORlinux - it is great .. IMO 
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|