LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Poll: Suse 10.0 or 10.1 install slower than Mandriva 2005 or 2006 (same size of package)
Poll Options
Suse 10.0 or 10.1 install slower than Mandriva 2005 or 2006 (same size of package)

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

Yes very much so
Yes a bit
Same
No, suse a bit faster
No, much faster
Yes, have noticed difference between 2 other distros
do not know / do not care

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2006, 06:11 PM   #1
Emmanuel_uk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Mandriva mostly, vector 5.1, tried many.Suse gone from HD because bad Novell/Zinblows agreement
Posts: 1,604

Rep: Reputation: 47
3.8 Gb Suse 10.1 slow install in 1h30 min. Mandriva 2006 was less than 40 min


Suse 10.1 looks slow to install, much slower than mandriva 2006
for about the same Gb of packages same HW (thinkpad R40e celeron 2 GHz)

Is this me? or does suse 10.1 does something "wrong" (conservative dma / hdparm)?
(This means that user should/can twaek kernel boot parameters for install)

Last edited by Emmanuel_uk; 06-06-2006 at 06:15 PM.
 
Old 06-07-2006, 12:36 PM   #2
TruongAn
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Vietnam (Việt Nam)
Distribution: Gentoo (desktop), Arch linux (laptop)
Posts: 728

Rep: Reputation: 33
The cause for slow installion is too many to mention.
Even in the same distro, different installion method can cause differesnt in installion time.
I will tell you some examples:
My box took 3 hours to install 10G FC5.
But when I choose the text installion instead of GUI, the time reduce to 2 hours.
For distro to distro comparison: FC5 took 3 hours to installion 10G but gentoo took me 5 hours to install 3G.
And the most funny things in install gentoo is if you check wrong options, the installion time can raise from 5 hours to 5 weeks or so.

In conclusion, I think comparison about installion time between distro make no sense
 
Old 06-15-2006, 10:27 AM   #3
jag2000
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 314
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 31
2 to 5 hours?

on my pc it took less then 15 mins for the install. I have installed mandriva 2006 power dvd and suse 10 and suse 10.1 using the dvd isos.
15 mins from install to surfing the net.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Very Slow Mandriva 2006 Install asdapp Mandriva 11 06-02-2006 08:42 PM
Sound Juicer WAS fast(1 Full CD in 15-20 Min), Now Slow as @$#% Balarabay1 Suse/Novell 7 03-29-2006 04:58 PM
Internet connection work for 5 min get slow and stop ftwilliam Linux - Networking 33 03-20-2006 07:43 PM
Min system regs for Mandrake (Now Mandriva???) Tux_Phoenix General 2 05-06-2005 12:03 PM
min. harddrive size full install MD Linux Kdiver58 Linux - Newbie 1 01-18-2003 01:59 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration