Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.


View Poll Results: What is your preferred placement for the main panel?
At the top 23 32.39%
At the bottom 32 45.07%
Vertical 6 8.45%
Other (two or more panels, middle etc.) 10 14.08%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 08-15-2013, 12:03 PM   #31
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: baltimore md usa
Distribution: 12.04.2 have had rh9.0 checking now ,dsl,ubuntu, pclos, smoothwall3,fedora,mandravia,
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
used to the bot

used to the bottom from early windows [98+se],so I like it there..I just do not know how to do it in Ubuntu 12.04.1LTS , which is a pain since it is a standard Svga monitor , not a wide screen HD display and takes away from open stuff in the desk top view and hot mail is so wide now it does not display correct . plus I like more then 1 site open . then I arrange my files on the right side of the desk so i just move an open window to the left to get to files . Next lcd with new vid card will have to be 4k capable I guess [dream?]
Old 08-15-2013, 04:41 PM   #32
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 343Reputation: 343Reputation: 343Reputation: 343
Hi there,

Originally Posted by G13man View Post
Next lcd with new vid card will have to be 4k capable I guess [dream?]
yea, you may be dreaming. But as I usually say: Nobody lives off their dreams. But those who dream are still alive.
Seriously, I haven't yet seen computer monitors with a resolution of more than 1920x1200, and if I had such a display, I might even consider using it in portrait orientation. Because whatever application I use - most of them call for more space in the vertical axis, whether it's web browsing, word processing, software development IDEs, and many more. Even watching videos on the PC monitor rarely requires more than 1024 pixels horizontally (that's DVD video in widescreen).

Currently I'm using 1600x1200 as the primary monitor, and 1280x1024 as the secondary. And already I'm becoming dainty thinking that 1600x1200 should be the absolute minimum. ;-)

[X] Doc CPU
Old 08-15-2013, 05:17 PM   #33
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Detroit
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 112

Rep: Reputation: 10
Thumbs up


I use bashrun for lauching most programs. I don't have icons on the desktop - that is where conky is. I create aliases instead of shortcuts/icons. Somethings are bound to they keboard for quick access.

I HATE taskbars/panels!!!

>= 2560x1600

Last edited by notsure; 08-15-2013 at 05:23 PM.
Old 08-15-2013, 06:13 PM   #34
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,170

Rep: Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345
I prefer the bottom, and auto-hide it. (That's where I learned to look for it when [IIRC] I started with a TRS-80.)

I also have a fairly rare mental abnormality: My visual memory (and visualization ability) is almost completely missing, so "icons" are, for me, usually meaningless. My desktop, by default, is just my wallpaper, which I change automatically, in random order, independently, on each screen and workspace, every minute.
Old 08-18-2013, 07:08 PM   #35
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: 1 AU from a G2V star
Distribution: PCLinuxOS LXDE
Posts: 149

Rep: Reputation: 261Reputation: 261Reputation: 261
On the bottom. Tried it on the top and just didn't like it.
Old 08-19-2013, 09:45 AM   #36
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Berlin
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian
Posts: 158

Rep: Reputation: 23
Bottom... because a quick mouse move to the total top-right plus a mouse click will close the current maximized window. Just got used to it..
Old 08-19-2013, 11:11 AM   #37
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: MN
Distribution: Gentoo, Fedora, Suse, Slackware, Debian, CentOS
Posts: 98
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 19
When CDE came out it was on the bottom. I moved from CDE to KDE and have lost some of the 'CDE' features over time such as the "filing cabinet" (ready a folder in the panel). I would like to see "shared-x" make a come-back.
Old 08-23-2013, 12:42 PM   #38
Registered: Apr 2010
Distribution: Debian, LMDE
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 11
It varies a bit over time but I:
Always have:1x panel at either top or bottom, always shown, with menus, windows-list, taskbar/indicators, workspace-switcher, ...;
And sometimes, only sometimes + 1x panel/dock with quick-launchers (and possibly some monitoring applets) at the side (usually left), auto-hiding.

I voted "Other"

Last edited by jdackle; 08-23-2013 at 12:47 PM. Reason: Vote stated, as not really clear by my previous comment I believe.
Old 09-03-2013, 02:26 AM   #39
Registered: Apr 2013
Distribution: Debian, Linux From Scratch, Mint
Posts: 118

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 24
I've been experimenting with Unity lately, with the vertical sidebar. Not too happy with it.

Also, I agree resolution matters a LOT!
Old 07-12-2015, 07:12 PM   #40
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2015
Distribution: Ubuntu GNOME
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
As someone who's been literally obsessed with this topic for the past years, spent tireless amounts of comparing which desktop metaphor is better and did much research of my own I can only conclude that a panel in the top is the best option for many reasons.

I see most of you just got used to having the panel in the bottom, not because it's convenient or functional, but because it's habit.

Microsoft never properly understood the desktop paradigm, not only with it's crap system, but with the placement of elements on the desktop, whereas Jobs of Apple understood it perfectly clear and built a desktop (Apple OS X) that solved all desktop usability questions in human history and became loved by millions of people, mostly designers, around the world. Why? Because not only it showcases a perfect harmony of elements, but it's mainly functional.

Take it from this perspective: everything you do, every app you interact with has all of its controls in the top of its window. Any web browser is a good example with the File, Edit, View... and other options in the top of the window, mostly the top left; or any other application for that matter, so what this means is, if you have your panel in the top you don't need to travel from one edge of the screen to the other like in Windows having to venture to the bottom of the screen to multitask by selecting another app and then again to the top to choose an option from the app's window and then go to the bottom of the screen again to... this is highly inefficient.

Desktops like Xfce are most productive in this matter, with one panel in the top that is very compact, allowing you to display not only all windows, but also indicators at the same time.

The windows panel is very clunky and can quickly become overfilled with icons and indicators and you cannot have more than one.

Panels on sides can disrupt the way some apps work/display, games in particular, and even though screens are usually wider, they need that working space, even though we are talking sometimes only about a few pixels here and there, but they matter. If you decide to use panels in vertical mode, it's best to use intellihide/autohide.

To conclude this, I'm not an Apple fan and I've never used a single Apple product, but their desktop metaphor is the best, because it can argue in the most productive ways regardless what anyone says. It's why Canonical adopted much of it in Unity.
Old 07-17-2015, 11:11 AM   #41
Registered: Apr 2013
Posts: 45

Rep: Reputation: 0
I like Ubuntu panel


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Setting app icons used in taskbar or dock? Many are blank or default fitzhugh Linux - Desktop 0 03-16-2010 05:48 PM
LXer: Cairo-Dock 2.1.3 Is Out, Features A Simplified Configuration Panel LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-08-2010 06:41 AM
KDE 3.5 no panel, only taskbar dinges Linux - Software 1 12-10-2005 08:48 AM
gnome panel placement with dualscreen setup pda Linux - General 1 06-29-2005 10:19 AM
kppp Doesn't Dock Into Panel After Connect eeverman Red Hat 5 09-12-2003 06:33 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration