LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2009, 10:07 AM   #1
MT_Keg
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: TN
Distribution: Debian/Fedora/OS X
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 15
Substitute for X11


Hey all,

I have installed debian on my system as only a base system and want to install fluxbox. I believe i first need to install a version of X to make this work. I was wondering if there were a minimalist version of X? I looked into Tiny X/Small X/Kdrive but there doesn't seem to be very much documentation on how to install/configure it. Are there any suggestions? I am trying to keep the ram useage down to a minimum... the codes i use are extrememly ram intensive.
 
Old 09-02-2009, 10:32 AM   #2
the trooper
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Debian Testing/Unstable Amd64
Posts: 1,476

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Can't say i know of a substitute for X,but the following guide i recommend for minimal Debian installs:

http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=13362

So to do what you need based on the guide i'd do:

Code:
aptitude install xorg xdm fluxbox
This should give you an install of X,a basic login manager and Fluxbox.
Have a read see what you think.

Edit:Forgot to say,using a login/display manager is not mandatory.
You can start the gui with the startx command,or it's possible to configure the system to boot directly into the gui.

Last edited by the trooper; 09-02-2009 at 11:05 AM.
 
Old 09-03-2009, 06:41 PM   #3
MT_Keg
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: TN
Distribution: Debian/Fedora/OS X
Posts: 25

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for your help trooper! I was hoping there would be some way that i could install some x server that would use very little resources. I run a lot of code that is RAM intensive and was hoping there were an xserver out there or a way to configure such that it doesn't eat up so many resources... Is there a way to solve this?
 
Old 09-03-2009, 06:48 PM   #4
Chromezero
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL, others
Posts: 470

Rep: Reputation: 40
You mentioned installing fluxbox, is that not minimal enough? A system running xserver and a lightwight WM like WindowMaker or Fluxbox is generally pretty snappy and requires very little resources. Things like switching to Aterm/Xterm instead of Konsole, or XMMS instead of Amarok can certainly free up some memory as well. In my experience, it's all the other stuff running that seems to eat up my memory. Even things like disabling an unused network card can free up some resources.
 
Old 09-04-2009, 09:21 AM   #5
i92guboj
Gentoo support team
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Lucena, Córdoba (Spain)
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 4,036

Rep: Reputation: 372Reputation: 372Reputation: 372Reputation: 372
There's still xf86, or kdrive, or [url=http://www.y-windows.org/]Y

There are many more implementations, but you are only going to reduce the memory load by ripping out features. In any case, Xorg itself can be compiled with less features if that's truly what you want. There's a minimal flag for the configure script that disables xvfb, xnest, dri, dri2, glx, record and probably many more sweeties. Beware, minimal really means minimal. Most modern applications will assume you have a current server, and not something from the stone age.

As said above, you shouldn't really be worrying about this unless you are doing some very specialized stuff. All you can save from here will be pointless if you are planning to run firefox. X is not much of a deal compared to the rest of programs that most people use nowadays.
 
  


Reply

Tags
substitute, x11


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
getch substitute narendra.pant Programming 1 02-24-2007 07:11 AM
Core 4 - X11-devel complains about X11-libs which are installed Ephracis Fedora 3 09-05-2005 09:32 AM
dreamweaver - substitute? curmudgeon42 Linux - Software 1 06-03-2004 09:18 PM
vlock substitute? Narooze Linux - Software 4 01-05-2004 04:27 PM
Roaming X11/Xfree86, X11 proxy zapp Linux - Software 1 09-12-2003 08:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration