Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Playing with debian testing cli version and am building from ground up. I am falling in love with e17. But I don't know what kind of software to get that won't look completely like a fish out of water in it. Or is that just the way it is with just a wm?
Playing with debian testing cli version and am building from ground up. I am falling in love with e17. But I don't know what kind of software to get that won't look completely like a fish out of water in it. Or is that just the way it is with just a wm?
dwm for geeks
fluxbox for a user friendly fast desktop
openbox rocks too
e17 is fancy sure, nice wm More advanced but very cool
The "problem" with E17 is that it uses its own toolkit (EFL) for the applications that comes with it, while almost any third party software either uses the Qt or the GTK toolkits. That simply does not allow a consistent look, you will have to live with that.
Alternatively, don't use E17, but one of the more generic options, like Openbox or Fluxbox and limit yourself to use only applications using one of the toolkits.
I have tried that and the outcome was not very good. After all, what is it worth if an application blends nice into the rest when one using the other toolkit works better for you. I don't care about the look anymore at all, function is more important than form.
Last edited by TobiSGD; 01-26-2014 at 10:40 PM.
Reason: fixed typos
I would look at the list of applications that come bundled with distros like AntiX or LinuxBBQ, as these applications have been carefully selected and tested to work great with minimalist windows managers.
If you are interested in tiling window managers (I'm not), I know a fellow who swears by i3.
I like Fluxbox, because I like eye candy. It's really plain out of the box, but can be configured up to look really nice.
Personally, I would consider E17 (which I like so much I'm running it on three machines) to more of a desktop than a WM, what with the desktop gadgets and all.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.