Linux - DesktopThis forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
gentoo, sourcemage, lfs, etc all compile apps, etc
so sometimes it can take forever to get a system up and running
slackware and arch are my favorites as they have both binary pkgs and ability to compile stuff too.
slackware is the most simplistic distro ever and very cool
you actually have full control in all distros but if you really wanna "build" a system
then gentoo, sourcemage, calculate-linux-scratch, linux-from-scratch, and lunar linux
fedora 13 is "bleeding edge", however it is more like ubuntu....
gentoo, sourcemage, lfs, etc all compile apps, etc
so sometimes it can take forever to get a system up and running
slackware and arch are my favorites as they have both binary pkgs and ability to compile stuff too.
slackware is the most simplistic distro ever and very cool
you actually have full control in all distros but if you really wanna "build" a system
then gentoo, sourcemage, calculate-linux-scratch, linux-from-scratch, and lunar linux
fedora 13 is "bleeding edge", however it is more like ubuntu....
Thank You so much for your reply.
I think that I'll try Slackware-current for start and then I'll try to build a LFS system.
I'm not interested if this will take time because I have 2 pc and I have one dedicated only to experiment with Linux so this isn't a problem.
One question about gentoo that I'd really like to try install but I have never installed because compilation time: I have an i7920 Overclocked to 3Ghz with a P6T Deluxe V2 and 12GB RAM DDR3 1333. How many time do you think that I'll need to have a working system with xorg installed?
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 (or whatever I happen to be playing with this week)
Posts: 11
Rep:
As long as you don't mind writing a lot of config files (and if you're considering gentoo you probably don't), I would definitely go with arch. It's much easier to get the initial install running than gentoo is, and it's a rolling release distro, unlike slackware, so you don't have to reinstall when some new version comes out. Just be aware (as you probably are), that it does require quite a bit of tweaking to get things running the way you want.
As long as you don't mind writing a lot of config files (and if you're considering gentoo you probably don't), I would definitely go with arch. It's much easier to get the initial install running than gentoo is, and it's a rolling release distro, unlike slackware, so you don't have to reinstall when some new version comes out. Just be aware (as you probably are), that it does require quite a bit of tweaking to get things running the way you want.
I have never tried arch however I absolutely don't mind to write config files.
What I want is a distro that use primary unstable and bleeding edge software.
In my linux life, I never used a stable distro, I have tried various distros but never a stable version.
I have used Debian Sid, Mandriva Cooker and Fedora Rawhide however now I want something that will give me full control of what I do.
For example I don't like to install firefox from binary but I prefer download the source and compile myself but not the stable on the beta source but the nightly builds.
Same thing I'd like to do with KDE and Gnome because even if many times there is ever a bug I like this way to work in Linux.
Also the kernel, I like to compile the kernel myself rather then have an already compiled kernel package because I like to have full control on every aspect of my Linux installation.
Then if I'll get a kernel panic ok but in this way I have what I want.
Also I want a reactive system and not a system like Ubuntu that when I click on the application menu I have to wait almost 2 second before the menu will open.
I would say Arch is what you are looking for. Total control is pretty well forced upon you. Slackware-current is pretty close, although you have more control over whether you want total control or not.
Also I want a reactive system and not a system like Ubuntu that when I click on the application menu I have to wait almost 2 second before the menu will open.
I'd say Linux From Scratch will be absolute most bleeding edge and full control, since you can't get any more full control than you build the distro from scratch yourself.
He said he wanted bleeding edge. As much as I love slackware (running 13.1 stable 64 bit) it would not qualify as bleeding edge. That is exactly why I use it though. Stable software, very configurable.
But yes, your recommendation of Arch seems to really fit the bill.
And no time comsuming compiling of software either.
Last edited by diamondsandrain; 07-17-2010 at 09:25 PM.
He said he wanted bleeding edge. As much as I love slackware (running 13.1 stable 64 bit) it would not qualify as bleeding edge. That is exactly why I use it though. Stable software, very configurable.
But yes, your recommendation of Arch seems to really fit the bill.
And no time comsuming compiling of software either.
Slackware-current and Arch aren't that far apart in terms of versions.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.