LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2010, 03:03 PM   #16
jlinkels
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bonaire
Distribution: Debian Wheezy/Jessie/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 4,236

Rep: Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545Reputation: 545

I am using Debian since 2004, and I see no reason to change it.

Why should I? I have been investing 6 years in learning all ins and outs of Debian. Starting over with a new distro voids all that knowledge. Even Debian is not perfect.

I recommend against distro hopping. Changing distro because you can't solve something is replacing known problems with a lot of unknown problems.

jlinkels
 
Old 08-22-2010, 04:13 PM   #17
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714
+1 for Arch rolling release.
 
Old 08-23-2010, 05:49 PM   #18
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 1,251

Rep: Reputation: 252Reputation: 252Reputation: 252
Here's what's currently on my desktop PC:

Fedora Rawhide - installed Aug 22
Fedora 14alpha - installed Aug 15
Fedora 13 - installed Feb 27
Ubuntu 10.10alpha - installed Jun 12
Mint 9 - installed May 22
 
Old 08-23-2010, 07:21 PM   #19
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 1,808

Rep: Reputation: 234Reputation: 234Reputation: 234
Good question!

A couple of months ago, I upgraded to Slackware 13.1 from version 12.0, which I had been using since July 2007. Prior to that, I was using 10.2 for almost 2 years. Before this, I was pretty much upgrading to new versions as they were released... all the way back to version 7.0.

As I get older, and other things in life take up more of my time, I find that I'm not so keen to upgrade something which works.
 
Old 08-23-2010, 08:53 PM   #20
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
Ubuntu 9.10 since November 2009, then upgraded to 10.10 the day it was released.

Had an on-and-off love affair with openSUSE which ended about a month ago.

I'm also running any number of distro's in virtualbox at any given time-- Mint, PCLinuxOS, CentOS 5x, and PC-BSD 8.1.
 
Old 08-24-2010, 04:45 AM   #21
konsolebox
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Gentoo, Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,245
Blog Entries: 16

Rep: Reputation: 233Reputation: 233Reputation: 233
My Gentoo init says 2007
 
Old 08-24-2010, 05:20 AM   #22
DragonSlayer48DX
Registered User
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,454
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 74
My "workhorse" distro is Ubuntu. I upgraded to 8.04 when support ended for 6.06.

I only use LTS versions; They're supported for three years.

Cheers
 
Old 08-24-2010, 12:08 PM   #23
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,227
Blog Entries: 23

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
So...maybe rkelsen's approach is the better one...dont touch it if it works...

Perhaps (if it is internet-safe) I should simply continue with FC10 until I'm fed up with it...
Then I will have to do the switch, Fedora changes way too frequently...

So... hey, that leaves me with a void PC that I can play around with! Wheeee!!!!
 
Old 08-24-2010, 01:30 PM   #24
eegerda
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: NJ
Distribution: Centos 5.5
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1
I used Fedora until 2008, F8 was the last verison of Fedora I used. Due to the short life cycle of Fedora I switched to Centos 5. I've been running Centos 5 ever since and never had a problem with it. When I do have time I do play with other distros in a VirtualBox.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 03:32 AM   #25
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,227
Blog Entries: 23

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
Hi,

Ok, all of ya: T-N-X!!!

I think I found my distro: Arch.

Requirements:
-Rolling, no need to reinstall over and over : check
-Up to date : check
-Sound in Java : check
-Sun JDK/JRE : check
-Speed : check, but that's to be expected, it is a newer machine...
-Educational : big check, I need a disto I can learn something from. Granted, I could have learned more from LFS, but hey, I'm not that accomplished yet...

All in all the distro I was looking for!

Thanks everybody

Thor
 
Old 09-03-2010, 04:33 AM   #26
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 55
I keep updating my Linux installations to ensure they're bleeding edge (and in most cases do it by adding new package repositories [like Maverick ones to Lucid]), but I have had Ubuntu since Jaunty and Mint since 7 "Gloria". If you count the years before I got the new network adapter and before I switched back to WinBloze (briefly), I actually used Ubuntu Hardy and gOS 2 "Rocket" as well. Those were the days, but now I consider Linux my passion.
 
Old 09-03-2010, 10:00 AM   #27
honeybadger
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: India
Distribution: Slackware (mainly) and then a lot of others...
Posts: 855

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am very impressed with Vector linux. This is the one that stays on the computer I use the most. Sadly they do not have the option to upgrade but then I always reformat the drive before installing a new one.
I agree with OP that the upgradation should not be done simply beacuse there is an issue you cannot solve. Forums like these exist for this very reason.
Learning the distros is something one should try doing.
So distrohopping is not recommended
 
  


Reply

Tags
distro


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cycles Mr-Bisquit Linux - Newbie 7 03-08-2009 05:22 PM
best long battery life laptop for linux grubber33 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 10-01-2007 02:21 PM
LXer: Hardy Heron readies for a long life LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-02-2007 07:10 AM
LXer: Tiny XScale module gains long-life Linux BSP LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-04-2006 03:21 AM
LXer: Sourcefire's Roesch pledges long, open-source life for Snort LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-26-2006 09:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration