| Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
12-30-2012, 01:53 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tartu, Århus,Nürnberg, Europe
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 588
Rep:
|
Good distro/desktop for Asus eee 700
I am planning to give a new breath to an old Asus eee 700 (500M Ram, 4G HDD, 7inch display). Looking around at google, all the related posts seem to be badly dated.
Anyone has an idea what is a suitable modern distro/desktop for such a small screen? I would love to use it for basic web browsing and perhaps as media player (if it is powerful enough). I might experiment with lubuntu/lxde on the one hand, but perhaps something completely different fits better (android?). It should also be usable for computer-illiterates, so puppuy will probably be voted down...
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 02:58 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,275
|
I used to run Arch on mine and later SalixOS, both ran nicely.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 03:04 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,275
|
As for a Desktop and browser evilwm and Opera with a tweaked config, allowed for great use of the limited screen real estate.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 03:36 PM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 12,525
|
I use a trimmed down Slackware with i3 WM on mine, but this seems not to be what you aim at.
If I would have to choose a different (more "user-friendly") OS/WM I would tend to use a minimal Debian (with Openbox), Salix (LXDE version, core install with added applications), Crunchbang or maybe Bodhi Linux.
|
|
|
|
12-30-2012, 05:01 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Tilburg, The Netherlands
Distribution: Antix, Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 80
Rep:
|
As a minimal Debian, you could also go for AntiX-core or AntiX-base. AntiX-base comes with dwm, wmii and jwm -It's all very lightweight and suitable. Because it's based on debian you've got everything else under your fingertips. You can find some suggestions on the installproces on this page
Last edited by Hannes Worst; 12-30-2012 at 05:33 PM.
Reason: Add extra info
|
|
|
|
12-31-2012, 11:34 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,288
|
I note you say that you're going to give it to a computer illiterate, so that rules out some suggestions. I'd go for something with a simple window manager (less pressure on screen space) but which is still user friendly: AntiX or Swift with Icewm, or the Fluxbox version of Salix.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2013, 05:03 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2008
Location: Tilburg, The Netherlands
Distribution: Antix, Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 80
Rep:
|
I think they both are quite user friendly. But I think AntiX will give better performance, especially in boottime.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2013, 05:43 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tartu, Århus,Nürnberg, Europe
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Puppy
Posts: 588
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi, thank you all for suggestions. So long I have played around with small debian with LXDE in a virtual machine. It looks quite good in terms of memory and disk, but the user interface might include large icons as default (something like Android/iPhone have). I will also give Antix a try.
What is the best choice for browser in terms of memory footprint?
|
|
|
|
01-01-2013, 10:46 AM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,288
|
Midori is pretty light.
I've just checked my system, and with two windows open, Firefox weighs in at 50MiB but Opera at 86MiB. That's a surprise: for some reason, I always thought Opera was light.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|