Quote:
Originally Posted by Johng
Kia ora Simon, I'm located at the southern end of the island, just north of the capital.
|
That's a bit too far for me - Wellington has an active LUG (WellyLUG) - which will probably be your closest. NZOSS is based there too.
Note: Richard Stallman will be paying a visit later this year (around September) keep an eye out.
Quote:
|
In your second quote, the 'dot' was where I meant it to be ie ".Document", and the symlink was labelled "Document".
|
Cool - that's why I asked rather than assumed.
If you don't want that directory - you are better advised to delete it. If you ant a place to store documents is the local partition - you can relabel it "local-documents" or something.
The
symlink would usually get the name of it's target. But you are right - it doesn't have to. If you want this to be used by all apps by default, it is easiest just to call the symlink after the directory being replaced. Remember, it's just a file - *nix just treats it the same and follows instructions.
Otherwise you have to reset the default behavior app by app (or find a distro which puts default locations in an external configuration file

).
One of the things which can frstrate some users is that gnu/linux distributions often have non-consistent behavior between applications. This is a side effect of the distribution coming with a wide range of software from different "vendors".
Different distros have this to different degrees and it's part of finding what's right for you. I tend to get more support requests concerning this for KDE apps - which I put down to that worthys less prescriptive approach (than, say, Gnome) which encourages innovation. But that's just my experience - you'll have noticed that everyone has their prejudices.
The next bit gets a short lecture
Quote:
|
Re: "that's a Windows thing. Microsoft invents its own jargon in many fields specifically to increase vendor lockin. We don't like to encourage them." That's not peculiar to Microsoft, open source ideals can sometimes be "user lockout".
|
eg. Open Office default to open formats...
I can see where you are coming from - unfortunately this lockout is not the choice of Sun or the OASIS group (of which MS was a member). The trouble is that Microsoft refuse to make their formats interoperable with other systems. They even change the formats at irregular intervals to stymie reverse engineering efforts.
This has even had the effect of breaking compatibility between MS applications - compare Office with Works for example. Even differetly licenced editions of Office.
MS Office formats would be great for a defacto standard (everyone uses them - almost) if only they
were a standard.
Despite this, OOo will write MS-compatible documents.
This does not help you promote the thing though.
I am also off-topic. We should really stick to the issue in hand in this thread. My main concern is that I am correctly understanding what you write and you cleared that up nicely. Kapai
If you want to know more about how the NZ FOSS community handles the other issues you have raised, please contact me privately.