LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-01-2013, 02:47 AM   #1
paul1945
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Best Distro for Amada m700


I have an Compaq Armada M700 notebook that I want to use as my "mobile" unit. It has 384Mb of RAM and a Pentium 3 600Mhz microprocessor. It also has 40Mb hard drive. It currently sports Windows 98se and is part of a WIFI network. I want to continue using the USB WIFI dongle and networking.
I know this is hardly a supercomputer, but I understand that there are Linux distros that run fine on this kind of machine, and I would appreciate some help in selecting the best one.
I currently run Ubuntu 12.10 on my desktop and some compatibility would be handy.
I am hardly an expert, so an easy to install system would be preferred.
Any help will be appreciated.
 
Old 01-02-2013, 12:51 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,653
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
For a machine like that I would go for Salix LXDE, antiX or a general purpose distro with a lightweight environment/software.
 
Old 01-02-2013, 04:38 PM   #3
paul1945
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 55

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for that TobiSGD. So how compatible is this distro with Ubuntu? Will it run the same software and emulators e.g. dosbox, wine?
If not, are there any other distros that are?
 
Old 01-02-2013, 04:44 PM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,653
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
Salix is compatible to Slackware, antiX is compatible to Debian. Running DosBox or Wine should not be a problem at all, but antiX will of course have a larger repository with pre-compiled packages than Salix.
If it must be something that is compatible with Ubuntu try WattOS, Bodhi or Lubuntu.
 
Old 01-03-2013, 06:12 AM   #5
paul1945
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 55

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for that, TobiSGD. I have compiled on Ubuntu (with rather a lot of help) a DosBox version that runs all my legacy software and has full printing capabilities. There are a number of other Apps that I use, and need, all of which I presume may not run on other distros than Ubuntu; but again I am no expert in this.
Anyhow, I have looked at WattOS, Bodhi and Lubuntu, all of which will probably run OK on my machine. I have also found Xubuntu, but both the Lubuntu and Xubuntu Website tend to use Lawyers speak when describing the minimum hardware requirements; like you should have at least 512Mb of RAM but it will run in 256Mb. Well, does it work OK in 384Mb or not? That is the question. If you compare say Xubuntu and Lubuntu, Xubuntu can actually run on a lower spec machine than Lubuntu; but can it? It's not terribly clear from the Website. I guess the only people that can make some definitive statements are the users, and that is the feedback I am hoping to get.

Last edited by paul1945; 01-03-2013 at 06:13 AM.
 
Old 01-03-2013, 07:09 AM   #6
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,653
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
Lubuntu is in general more lightweight than Xubuntu. What they mean with "It runs in 256MB but you should have 512MB" is that you can start the distribution in 256MB, but to have a somewhat convenient experience when actually using some programs you should have 512MB.
 
Old 01-03-2013, 05:30 PM   #7
paul1945
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Posts: 55

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hello TobiSGD, thanks for that clarification. I will give Lubuntu a go. Your assistance is appreciated.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compaq Armada m700 + linux fdahl_009 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 02-10-2006 11:26 AM
Best distro for Compaq Armada M700? Waerner Linux - Laptop and Netbook 5 10-03-2005 12:19 PM
Cannot Connect On Compaq Armada M700 snipes107 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 07-05-2005 11:37 PM
Problem with wheel on lohitech m700 koy Linux - Hardware 8 09-18-2004 05:58 AM
SuSE 9.1 with Armada m700 PengyDaPenguin Linux - Newbie 1 05-12-2004 09:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration