LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General > Linux - Certification
User Name
Password
Linux - Certification This forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux certification.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-09-2004, 08:23 PM   #1
freckledpenguin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
"Engineer" vs. "Expert" vs. "Specialist"


Hello all,

I work for Novell. As a member of the Education Department, I have been asked about a new certification being considered. During the course of a team discussion, I raised a concern that using the term "Engineer" is perhaps improper when describing a less than 4-year engineering degree from an accredited university (or similar education). I stated that there are those that feel that the term is unearned by anyone that does not fit the above description (I personally am an "engineer" on at least two different companies software).

Because I chose to open my mouth, I have been asked to gather feedback from those who are in the GNU/Linux community that have an opinion they are willing to share (dangerous, I know...but necessary ).

Please give me your reasons why Engineer is/isn't acceptable and/or why an alternative might be a better/worse approach (I've suggested two other options -- expert and specialist).

Thanks folks... I'll be lurking...

-FP
 
Old 11-10-2004, 01:10 AM   #2
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
To be honest, I am uncomfortable with the word Engineer, but cannot for the life of me come up with an alternative. "Expert" also gives me the connotation of a self imposed title "Oh yeah, I'm an expert" or a tabloid story "said the computer expert".

Specialist seems to me to be a title which may lead people to exclude any other considerations of skill sets - "oh, you're a Linux specialist are you? Well we have Windows here so I don't think we can use you".

So although Engineer may not be the most appropriate word, it may be the best that fits.
 
Old 11-10-2004, 02:06 AM   #3
Waalern
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
Engineer is a "Real" degree. Specialist are a more suitable name for a heavy certification track.

My opinion....


Waalern
Oslo, Norway

Last edited by Waalern; 11-10-2004 at 02:10 AM.
 
Old 11-10-2004, 02:39 AM   #4
theYinYeti
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: France
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 1,897

Rep: Reputation: 61
I agree with Waalern.
"Engineer" in France is at least 5 years in a recognized university or equivalent.

"Specialist" or "Expert"... I don't know. IMHO, both refer to someone having studied all aspects of a specific area of knowledge.

The way I see it personally, "Specialist" is more of a reknown person; someone you can be sure of, because of their experience, and the good work already done. While an "Expert" would rather be a self-proclaimed person (due to a certification or otherly acquired knowledge), without any judgement on their quality: some are good, some are bad.

That's the way I see it.

Yves.
 
Old 11-11-2004, 08:16 AM   #5
Fritz_Monroe
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Mint 13
Posts: 272

Rep: Reputation: 30
Personally I feel that engineer is the most appropriate title for a higher level cert. The computer industry knows that a certification titled as engineer requires a lot of study and is not an entry level cert.

As for specialist, I feel it suggests that you don't have a broad knowlege and posess little experience or knowlege of any other product.

Expert seems to be a self proclaimed title.

How about professional, authority, maven, virtuoso, savant. Ok, those last couple don't fit all that well.

F_M
 
Old 11-11-2004, 02:36 PM   #6
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
I was holding out for "Certified Linux Guru" or maybe "Certified OSS Evangelist" but alas, in Texas you have to have a 4-year degree from an accredited (by the Pope) religious institution to legally call yourself a guru or evangelist.

Last edited by Crito; 11-11-2004 at 02:37 PM.
 
Old 11-13-2004, 04:20 PM   #7
freckledpenguin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2002
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Many thanks!

Thanks all for replying. I have found your feedback to be helpful. Your answers, along with some other research I have done, has given me some good information that I will use (hopefully to make the right choice, eh?).

If you have more to say, please keep adding responses. I'll be checking back later this week with an update on where things are headed.

-FP
 
Old 11-20-2004, 11:49 AM   #8
egag
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,721

Rep: Reputation: 52
i would go for " Certified Linux User ", wich, in the near future, will become some kind of " drivers license " for the www.
it would stop spreading virii etc .
( no license -> no connect ).

egag
 
Old 12-07-2004, 11:24 AM   #9
Fraudulent
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Stockolm, Sweden
Distribution: Novell SuSe Professional
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15
I am also a "engineer" certified by your company amongst others.
I believe that the term Engineer might be improper, Expert would sound better but is not really appropriate. There are lots of certified people out there where "engineer" is a bad enough term. Calling them experts would be a disaster.

If you study what all us "engineers" actually do there is a wide variety of jobs.
Designers
Implementors
Integrators
and so on..

Some are very specialized in a single area, some run the whole show.
Maybe specialist is a better term.

Novell Certified Linux Systems Specialist
Novell Certified NetWare Systems Specialist
Novell Certified Integrations Specialist
Novell Certified Directory Specialist
Novell Certified Networking Specialist.


What do you call people like me that goes for the whole shebang?

/Mats
#9587840 ;-)
 
Old 12-07-2004, 11:37 AM   #10
egag
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,721

Rep: Reputation: 52
Guru
 
Old 12-07-2004, 11:41 AM   #11
samael26
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: France, Provence
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 848

Rep: Reputation: 30
An Engineer is an expert specialized in a specific scientific field and has a degree to prove it
An Expert may be a specialist but not nesessarily an engineer and has dubious proofs of his assertions
A Specialist presumes too much of his own abilities
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bash script: using "select" to show multi-word options? (like "option 1"/"o zidane_tribal Programming 6 03-21-2013 10:35 AM
what is "sticky bit mode" , "SUID" , "SGID" augustus123 Linux - General 10 08-03-2012 04:40 AM
Telling people to use "Google," to "RTFM," or "Use the search feature" Ausar General 77 03-21-2010 11:26 AM
"Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0"." zaps Linux - Games 9 05-14-2007 03:07 PM
Can't install "glibmm" library. "configure" script can't find "sigc++-2.0&q kornerr Linux - General 4 05-10-2005 02:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration