Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Gentoo
User Name
Gentoo This forum is for the discussion of Gentoo Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2013, 06:31 PM   #1
Registered: Jan 2013
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 166
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 4
Gentoo: Versioned Portage Trees...?

I was wondering if there are any technical or practical reasons why Gentoo doesn't have versioned portage trees, similar to the binary distros having different releases?

Obviously, one downside to Gentoo is that you don't have LTS releases, or the (practical) ability to keep an old, stable system secure. There is glsa-check, of course, which helps, but it doesn't allow you necessarily to keep your system in the stable state. Another issue is that Gentoo systems (in my experience) that are allowed to get old inevitably become impossible to upgrade, because you have to upgrade to latest instead of moving up critical transition points.

I'm a long-time Gentoo user, not a troll looking to bash it. But this has always been an issue for me.
Old 06-21-2013, 03:13 AM   #2
Gentoo support team
Registered: May 2008
Location: Lucena, Córdoba (Spain)
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 4,052

Rep: Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379
This is just my guess on this, I've never seen this discussion arise in the mailing lists (that doesn't necesarily mean it didn't take place, though).

But I don't think there's any technical reason why this couldn't happen, other than the lack of interest and/or man power. I can think at least 5 ways to achieve this, and that only in a quick glance, there are surely many more,
  • profiles, those can have custom masks, uses, keywords...
  • keywords, for example, we could add a lot of greys in between the white (let's say "x86") and the black (~x86)
  • overlays, these can implement a combination of the two above
  • alternative/decoupled portage trees, as you suggested. IMHO not necessary, since it would take just some kb of metadata to difference an LTS tree from a standard one
  • FEATURES/eclasses

Those are not necessarily exlusive at all.

The problem is that Gentoo has always been understaffed. So (again my personal guess, which might be completely incorrect) the problem could be that. Plus the fact that the do-it-y/self phylosophy that reigns soverein between the Gentoo users doesn't make this a top-priority.

If you truly want to discuss this and iron it a bit, you might be interested in joining the gentoo-user mailing list, and then, once the idea matures, join some other more specific list such as gentoo-server, gentoo-security and/or gentoo-releng. For this to happen, a proper Gentoo Project, backed by a team of interested persons should be founded.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gentoo-Wiki, Gentoo-Portage Down H_TeXMeX_H Linux - News 0 11-10-2008 05:29 AM
Gentoo: Help with portage. Scorlibrian Linux - Distributions 5 07-02-2005 08:52 AM
gentoo portage time112852 Linux - Software 1 01-03-2005 01:15 AM
Gentoo Portage acjt Linux - Distributions 1 04-02-2003 11:07 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration