GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I can tell you that what made people I know switch over wasn't the XP look, it was the lack thereof. They had heard me talking of Linux and how it's stable, but I don't think that had much of an impact, even security didn't matter that much to them.
Once they saw my fluxbox and KDE desktops, they wanted copies of my install CDs. I don't think XP lookalikes will help much :P
I'm talking about the average joe user, not the person who looks to customize thier desktops. Many people are afraid of the unfamiliar, and if given both a comfortable looking OS and a Free OS... then I think we may have many more users.
I agree that many people are enticed by the customized look of linux, but they are not who I would consider Average Joe Users. Just my 2
Actually, Average Joe User's going to be more disoriented by something that looks like an XP but doesn't quack like an XP.
The flip side of the Rule of Least Surprise is to avoid making things superficially similar but really a little bit different. This is extremely treacherous because the seeming familiarity raises false expectations. It's often better to make things distinctly different than to make them almost the same.
-- Henry Spencer
At least initially. *After* they know things are different and have adjusted to that, I can see such an interface becoming *more* attractive. But I don't see it helping anyone make any transition in the first place.
but, if you look at the screeshots, to the average joe this will quack like XP. If you sat someone down at this desktop who was a casual user and had only simple tasks to perform (web, email,word processing) they would be none the wiser. Go to the control panel for this, go to the start menu for this, open the display properties for this.... just like in windows xp. It is only when they were upgrading thier hardware or adding programs to it that they would really notice the difference.
Well, I figured the confusion would arise when they stuck a CD in and tried to access anything on it or got a '/dev/dsp: device busy' when they wanted to play some tunes or got a 'permission denied' when they tried to read a file or on and on...