LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2005, 03:51 AM   #1
x-32b
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Linux VS Longhorn


removed

Last edited by x-32b; 03-05-2005 at 07:02 AM.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 03:58 AM   #2
scuzzman
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Hilliard, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Kubuntu
Posts: 1,851

Rep: Reputation: 47
Re: Linux VS Longhorn

Quote:
Originally posted by x-32b
how things have changed look who’s the real innovator now and linux and mac Os are still stuck with fat32.
Well, you've showed your ignorance. Truth is, neither Mac nor Linux natively use FAT32...
I don't know what Mac uses as I don't use Macs, but Linux uses (primarily)
reiserfs
ext2
ext3

Also - the title of this thread is flawed, as you make no mention of Linux except from this single statement which is flawed. There is no comparison being done in this thread, it is simply a poor review.

Also, WinFS is not being released with Longhorn. End of story. They're sticking with NTFS right now.

One more thing: Linux is a kernel. A K-E-R-N-E-L. A kernel cannot be compared to an entire operating system.

EDIT: spelling/grammar

Last edited by scuzzman; 02-15-2005 at 04:06 AM.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 03:58 AM   #3
frob23
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Roughly 29.467N / 81.206W
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, NetBSD
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 47
1) WinFS is NOT coming out with Longhorn.

That was canned weeks ago. It is going to be in a future release of Windows.

2) Don't advertize windows here.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:01 AM   #4
frob23
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Roughly 29.467N / 81.206W
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, NetBSD
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 47
scuzzman,

Good point, BSD is ffs, ufs, or ufs2... or any number of other formats (so I assume Mac uses that as well). No FAT32... didn't even notice that point in the main article... since the big error (in my eyes) was that Microsoft couldn't even get WinFS stable enough to release so it was diked out in a big press release weeks ago.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:06 AM   #5
scuzzman
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Hilliard, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Kubuntu
Posts: 1,851

Rep: Reputation: 47
Mac uses UFS... I knew it, just didn't remember the name.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:22 AM   #6
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 120Reputation: 120
I think this should go into the Distro reviews section
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:30 AM   #7
frob23
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Roughly 29.467N / 81.206W
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, NetBSD
Posts: 1,449

Rep: Reputation: 47
LOL... yes it needs to be there.

Exactly as it is right now... spelling errors, factual errors, and comments... everything left exactly like it is (with the ability to add of course but not change).
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:46 AM   #8
scuzzman
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Hilliard, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Kubuntu
Posts: 1,851

Rep: Reputation: 47
Just a few more things to point out as they just entered my mind.

1) WinFS grouping seems very much like the way Mac does it, in that all programs are in an Applications folder, etc.
2) I can organize Linux very easily this way through the use of symlinks.
3) VB/VBS is very dangerous. Fully incorporating .NET into the OS was potentially the dumbest thing Microsoft has ever done.
4) Do you know what Palladium actually is?
 
Old 02-15-2005, 04:52 AM   #9
pevelius
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Familiar, OS X
Posts: 145

Rep: Reputation: 15
Re: Linux VS Longhorn

Quote:
Originally posted by x-32b
Longhorn build 4074

No 6
And one of the most important new features is what I call auto reload

Say your typing in wor...Open office
A 5-page essay you haven’t saved yet and it crashes........

In xp or any windows os
Your essay is kaput gone and you get an error message with some number and Sorry

In longhorn
The screen freezes for approx 1 sec and recovers, you get a ! Icon in the
Classic tray, which has your error message hidden away, your 5-page essay Is fine

Or in media player your music restores from where it was pre crash all youHear is a 1 sec stall

Or in any other .exe file
crash,stall,recover with settings/work.

So does this look like xp with a new skin if you think so stop skipping
Parts
It certainly is a massive change from all other oses

so, does this mean they cannot make the os stable enought to run programs properly? or does it mean that everything you do gets logged all over your system in case someone wants to take a peek at it? maybe both.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:04 AM   #10
bornhj
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu Hoary, Slack 10.1
Posts: 120

Rep: Reputation: 15
Oh, for the days when they taught spelling in schools....

I have used Longhorn 4074 as well, and it is a great step forward (at least for Microsoft), however it is continuing along the typical Microsoft line of user friendliness and pretty GUIs.

The installation for the RTM of LH will be much different from the alpha.

This whole argument just boils down to the question asked almost every day here: "Is Windows Better Than Linux?"
After using both LH and FC3 extensively, I have to say that even if LH is vastly improved by RTM, I won't buy it. It's just not worth it. Linux IS user friendly enough to compete with LH, especially FC/MDK/SuSE etc.

The thing I personally like most about LH is the new references to drives. It's no longer C:\, D:\, A:\, but rather Longhorn, DVD Drive, Floppy Drive. It certainly makes the FS easier to navigate.
The whole Documents, Games, Music etc. all relies upon WinFS, so it won't be in RTM. It's just grouping WinFS meta tags. When WinFS is off (like I have it) the links serve no use, and are easily removed in the registry (still the stupidist part of Windows).

Quote:
2) Don't advertize windows here.
It's the general forum, we do what we want.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:12 AM   #11
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Sussex, England
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,457

Rep: Reputation: 45
Hey, at least it looks like they've finally separated apps from the kernel so crashing an app doesn't mean crashing the whole OS - give them credit for THAT much, at least!

The WinFS thing sounds like how I already divide my files up: I have a Docs folder, an MP3 folder, a Games folder. . . it's a bit of a "blinding flash of the obvious", IMHO. (Isn't this also how Rox works?)

If it's well implemented, maybe it'll finally mean uninstalling software will actually remove all the files it installed. Somehow, I suspect it just means it'll be harder to look at the hard drive to see them, tho. Maybe I'm a cynic. . .

If this little list is all that's changed from XP, I'm sadly disappointed. It's pitifully similar to what they've already got, without even a few simple additions like the multiple desktops that Linux users take for granted.
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:18 AM   #12
scuzzman
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Hilliard, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Kubuntu
Posts: 1,851

Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally posted by oneandoneis2
If this little list is all that's changed from XP, I'm sadly disappointed. It's pitifully similar to what they've already got, without even a few simple additions like the multiple desktops that Linux users take for granted.
Tabbed F'in browsing!
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:23 AM   #13
oneandoneis2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Sussex, England
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,457

Rep: Reputation: 45
True, but by the time Longhorn actually comes out, Firefox will be everywhere
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:24 AM   #14
x-32b
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
itsactuly a review for longhorn showing how completly different it is
yes i know about ex2 i use knoppix.
its ok but mac os uses fat 32

dont flame its just areview
i should have put in my history
im primalery a linux user
sorry
 
Old 02-15-2005, 05:26 AM   #15
x-32b
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
And win fs is not canned
see my screenshots
concrete evidence of win fs
it was microspin fs isnt gone
lets leave it at that for now
 
  


Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Link Directory Application: Please Help Beta Test This vharishankar General 12 07-18-2005 10:46 AM
Sarge or Woody and Beta 4 or Test Candidate 1 linda Debian 1 06-15-2004 08:36 AM
Glibc Pass II Test Results g_goblin Linux From Scratch 0 11-17-2003 12:42 PM
i test linux + win2k, results are laughable ! qwijibow Programming 7 09-22-2003 03:06 PM
Leak Test results Zvezda Linux - Security 12 03-13-2002 05:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration