GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I used Mac's then I don't really see the point in celebrating the birthday of something I never really used especially since it's the really bad era of MS.
Not going to happen. For youtube alone, you would need hardware which windows 95 was never designed to deal with and for which no drivers exist. You would also struggle to find any modern browser to run on it.
I have to agree with this. I still have an old TI-575CD laptop hanging around with Win 95 original release on it. I had a load of fun last year just trying to get an older Firefox on it. The newer browsers won't even install on it. I was able to use both an old Firefox and IE 5.5 to surf the web with it over a T-10 network card hooked up to a Linksys ethernet bridge to do a sort of wifi. My experience was that these old browsers don't like todays internet. They crashed alot.
I think this is marginally related to this thread: One of my all-time favorite screensavers is something called Kaleidoscope 95, which was created for Win95. It was a brilliant piece of work.
It's the only Windows shareware screensaver I ever paid money to license. The graphics are gorgeous, it's highly configurable, and it has the added feature that, if audio is playing, the images dance to the audio. I still use it with Win7 on those infrequent occasions that I boot over to get the updates.
It's the only Windows screensaver that I would like to see ported to Linux.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.