LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-13-2004, 10:50 AM   #16
zekko
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware, debian
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15

I'm no Windows expert, but isn't Windows 2000 built on NT just like XP is? Then I would think the core of the operating system would be the same and probably lot's of exploits for 2000 could work for XP.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 12:13 PM   #17
witeshark
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Miami FL
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well I'm actually very surprised how long this took!
 
Old 02-13-2004, 01:45 PM   #18
david_ross
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Slackware, RedHat, Debian
Posts: 12,047

Rep: Reputation: 64
This was posted earlier so the threads will be merged.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 07:37 PM   #19
teval
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 720

Rep: Reputation: 30
I suggest not looking at it. It could affect any project you continue to work on afterwards and might undo ages of work.
Worst thing you could possibly do is "help" wine or a similar project with it. It would completely wreck the project by discrediting it, and by ensuring it gets sued into the ground.

If you ever plan to work on any open source projects don't read the code, or risk taining the project.
 
Old 02-14-2004, 01:52 AM   #20
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
you should be more concred with what itll do to you if you do look at it, let the windows hackers take a look at it and see how every line contains a valerablilitiy(even tho i ahvent looked at it, it would make sence sence the MS themselfs are scared of people finding valnerabilitiys ) they can use to make the next big virus/worm/nuke/whatever, besides, all that bad code might be unreadale by linux hackers/programers, and n worse caase might make you code worser code
 
Old 02-14-2004, 01:03 PM   #21
witeshark
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Miami FL
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
It's gonna be a while before anything abusive is ever made as a direct result of the leaked code. Quotes about being glad to have a Mac and all the profanity hints that the inside coders were given assignments that alarmed them about the quality of the OS. Does that make sense?
 
Old 02-14-2004, 01:14 PM   #22
natalinasmpf
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 309

Rep: Reputation: 30
Isn't this better? We use this to put into the new kernels and solve the closed source issues of NTFS?

Two good things:

Better NTFS support in kernels
New material to incoporate in Wine(X)

Plus the released source can be improved on!
 
Old 02-14-2004, 06:54 PM   #23
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
2 problems, MS might go after that stuff now saying its break pantents or inelectualy property, and copywrite or whatever, so like the guy said above a bit its best not to even look at teh code so MS wont have such a big case to sue you with
 
Old 02-14-2004, 07:47 PM   #24
tearinox
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: you dont want to know
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.2, Slackware 10, Windows XP, Windows 2003 Server
Posts: 348

Rep: Reputation: 30
Conspiracy theory: Maybe microsoft did this to freak out all the win2k users. Then they will all upgrade to winxp?

I feel kind of constrained because if i take one line of code from the source, i could be sued by microsoft. There are definetly heavy consequences for taking and even reading the code because microsoft is definetly going to be paranoid about this.

But wouldn't be interesting to see how they made MSpaint? hehe
 
Old 02-14-2004, 10:56 PM   #25
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
we alrdy know (or at least this is what i think), they bought the basic program from somwere else, added a few features the recylced from a word processing program, and viola!, just like every other piece of code they "made"
 
Old 02-15-2004, 12:36 AM   #26
natalinasmpf
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 309

Rep: Reputation: 30
Can they track everybody down who has the code?

Hell, no.

*googles*
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:41 AM   #27
iainr
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 631

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by tearinox
Conspiracy theory: Maybe microsoft did this to freak out all the win2k users. Then they will all upgrade to winxp?
I wondered that; but I don't think so. For one thing, XP has a fairly large shared code base with Win2K and for another thing, with Open Source looming as the big bad enemy, the last thing I would have thought MS would want to do is to both scare people about security and get them looking at upgrades : that might be the spur for some companies to look at migrating to Mac or Linux rather than staying with Windows.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 06:41 PM   #28
Abe_the_Man
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: ?????
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by SciYro
we alrdy know (or at least this is what i think), they bought the basic program from somwere else, added a few features the recylced from a word processing program, and viola!, just like every other piece of code they "made"
Imagine if hackers look at the code and it's discovered that windows contains stolen code from SCO!
 
Old 02-15-2004, 07:40 PM   #29
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
ah that would mean relaive from sco suing linux, they would go sue MS and MS would drag it out till sco goes bankrupt
 
Old 02-15-2004, 08:53 PM   #30
Invdaderzim
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
This is sort of like that movie Antitrust
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to convert Assembly code to "C" source code ssg14j Programming 2 08-01-2005 12:48 PM
HL2 source leaked!!! nemat0de Linux - Games 75 10-15-2003 02:45 PM
error in Access 2000 code Linh Programming 2 10-13-2003 09:42 AM
windows source code available here schatoor General 3 03-05-2003 08:23 AM
Source Code for Windows XP Kzin General 6 01-23-2002 08:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration