LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-12-2004, 07:09 PM   #1
closet geek
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: England
Posts: 146

Rep: Reputation: 15
Windows 2000 and NT source code leaked


http://news.geekhaven.net/#53

omg...!!!

cg
 
Old 02-12-2004, 10:09 PM   #2
yenonn
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Redhat 8.0, 9, Slackware 9.1
Posts: 511

Rep: Reputation: 30
http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158...?tag=nefd_lede
 
Old 02-12-2004, 11:59 PM   #3
heartsglory
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
Lightbulb Microsoft Windows source code leak!!!

Check this out and tell me what y'all think:http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._source_code_3


OMG billy's afraid...... BUWAHAHA!!!!!
 
Old 02-13-2004, 01:00 AM   #4
witeshark
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Miami FL
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yeah we all know now --what a laugh!
 
Old 02-13-2004, 01:40 AM   #5
Abe_the_Man
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: ?????
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well we should all be glad that those nasty hackers don't have the linux source code! I mean imagine all the viruses and hacks and general Chaos they could cause!!!

(sarcastic!)

Last edited by Abe_the_Man; 02-13-2004 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 02:01 AM   #6
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
just saw about that on the news a few minutes ago, i dono whats worse, MS saying hackers could use it to exploit windows, or the news people saying that, i mean how embarising that some hackers can exploit windows jsut because they have the codes, makes me glad i have a linux laptop
 
Old 02-13-2004, 02:09 AM   #7
beajedi
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like to see a Newstory about how Windows got patched and runs flawless because of the source code leak. Bill Gates just happens to find hacked, improved Windows source in his mailbox. . .
 
Old 02-13-2004, 03:06 AM   #8
tearinox
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: you dont want to know
Distribution: Gentoo 2004.2, Slackware 10, Windows XP, Windows 2003 Server
Posts: 348

Rep: Reputation: 30
its not that big of deal actually. All the hackers have decompiled important parts to discover most of the exploits already. I assume, that this will make it a little easier for them, and some exploits will probly come out of this.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 03:24 AM   #9
Abe_the_Man
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: ?????
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
That would be hilarious!! It would be amazing if hackers actually improve windows, instead of using it for exploits etc. That would definitely help people see that open source is most times, safer and more secure than closed source.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 03:50 AM   #10
yenonn
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Malaysia
Distribution: Redhat 8.0, 9, Slackware 9.1
Posts: 511

Rep: Reputation: 30
how come the hackers are not interested to hack linux..since linux is open source? or may be they are rather interested to hack something which is rare, hard to get it and yet costly?
 
Old 02-13-2004, 05:41 AM   #11
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
I have to admit I used to think that way about open vs. closed systems. I've now come to the realization I was completely wrong. It's secrecy itself that poses the greatest security risk... and I'm not just talking about source code either. Since open systems can be scrutinized by the general public, exploits/abuses are immediately exposed and corrected. Closed systems have the potential to be exploited/abused indefinitely. You have to consider the implications of this story when combined with the recent revelation MS kept a serious flaw secret from its customers for over six months. Closed systems leave the public at the mercy of insiders privy to the information.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 05:46 AM   #12
UltimaGuy
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .92, FC4
Posts: 840

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Well we should all be glad that those nasty hackers don't have the linux source code! I mean imagine all the viruses and hacks and general Chaos they could cause!!
Linux source code is freely available to every one. But the development model easily discourages any and all backdoors and also IMHO increases the security of the product. So, there is no great risk for Open source in gneral .
 
Old 02-13-2004, 07:53 AM   #13
perry
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: USA & Canada
Distribution: Slackware 12.0
Posts: 978

Rep: Reputation: 30
thats the big difference

Quote:
Originally posted by yenonn
how come the hackers are not interested to hack linux..since linux is open source? or may be they are rather interested to hack something which is rare, hard to get it and yet costly?
when a Microsoft hacker finds a flaw, yeah right.... let me start again

when a Microsoft user nearly callapses over all the flaws in just trying to use Windows, he decides to get f%$#ing even by sending lessons in the blatent obvious back Bill's way. even Bill himself has been known to eat brain dead "Microsoft Certified" programmers for lunch. i mean, i've seen these guys in action, outside a game of Pacman, these people shouldn't be within 500 miles of a computer

in any event, when a Linux user comes across a tiny area that can be improved or an expert manages to detect a tiny oversight, he or she is usually the first one to figure out a patch and get it sent in.

it can be said that the imputis is the same in both cases, notoriety, that is "i did this". however, more often than not in the case of Linux users, its a form of protection for their own installation as they need their findings verified by other Linux users. it's a community thing with Linux, kinda like how the French acted in 1791 after the fall of King Louis XVI, the citizens generally and unananimosly swore an oath to the "National Assembly".

whereas in Microsoft's case it's more like someone (another user gone to Linux) has just climbed over the Berlin wall and comrad Bill gets mighty pissed off about it.

- perry
 
Old 02-13-2004, 11:17 AM   #14
Abe_the_Man
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: ?????
Posts: 324

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by UltimaGuy
Linux source code is freely available to every one. But the development model easily discourages any and all backdoors and also IMHO increases the security of the product. So, there is no great risk for Open source in gneral .
Yeah i know, i was just joking in my above post. Hmm, these forums need a more sarcastic looking font........ But anyway, if anyone knows anything about the source code leak, they should report it to microsoft, making sure to let them know you are a LINUX user. We need to dispell the myth that *nix users are all hackers (of the evil variety). And also, it's the right thing to do. I mean the source code is microsoft's property, no matter how much i dislike microsoft, and despite the fact that i will never run one of their operating systems.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 11:34 AM   #15
iainr
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 631

Rep: Reputation: 30
I disagree. I think it's a very big deal. Security is one element : Microsoft's model of security through obscurity must take a major hit. It will also be very interesting to see what nasty surprises there are in the source code (e.g. comments, back doors) not to mention that the quality (or otherwise) of the Windows code will become apparent.

If it turns out that the Windows code quality is not as superb as Bill has been telling us (because, of course the proprietary model of software development is superior to the open source model), that could be a big dent in Bill's credibility.

In addition, the amount of code released is huge : millions of lines. Hackers could be going through this for years and finding new things. Microsoft get the bad part of open source security (all the bad guys can see the code) without the good part (all the good guys checking the code for bugs).

If I was an organisation running NT, I'd be wondering what on Earth is going to hit me next. I'd be getting calls from my friendly Microsoft salesman suggesting I might like to upgrade to XP or 2003. Hopefully, I'd also be getting calls from my friendly Linux salesman touting those offerings too; and something like this might help persuade me that maybe staying in the Microsoft fold isn't playing safe after all.

Last edited by iainr; 02-13-2004 at 11:36 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to convert Assembly code to "C" source code ssg14j Programming 2 08-01-2005 01:48 PM
HL2 source leaked!!! nemat0de Linux - Games 75 10-15-2003 03:45 PM
error in Access 2000 code Linh Programming 2 10-13-2003 10:42 AM
windows source code available here schatoor General 3 03-05-2003 09:23 AM
Source Code for Windows XP Kzin General 6 01-23-2002 09:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration