Quote:
|
Yep, it's what I used to use in the old DOS days, though I think it might have been XTreePro rather than 'gold'. Too long ago, can't remember for sure.
|
I've upgraded one Windoze 7, one Windoze 8.1, and did one full Windoze 10 install. All went without any real problems. Well, except for the fact that I had to purchase more RAM.
|
Yeah, it seems any one can upgrade a regularly used windows. There are some electronics packages that will not go in wine, and need a real windows. SoI don't use, but don't throw out any windows I get forced on me when I buy a laptop.
Windows does not like being archived for years on end, until I decide to keep it alive. I am like a newbie all over again with it.UEFI only adds trouble, because I have just disabled it. I found a vbs script to get to the real product key on some forum, and will go after it. I am having trouble registering. It's of passing interest only now. My (UEFI disabled) box is set to remain 100% Linux ATM. |
Not that you necessarily want to, but you can do EFI with Slackware. There's a couple of helpful threads in the Slackware-installation sub-forum if the docs haven't been updated. Haven't looked recently..
|
I think EFI is a vain attempt to make windows more secure, that causes huge problems. I cannot use a gpt disk on this box without automatically invokinhg it. I hope it will be seen as that and go away. Why should booting be such a PITA?
|
Quote:
|
I much prefer EFI. I think it's so much simpler, and easier than MBR, and recovery from crashes is so much easier, as well. I've never enjoyed playing with computers as much since EFI became the standard. Now SECURE BOOT, that's different, but EFI is IMO the best development in quite a long time.
|
For someone who started with LiLo as bootloader having a separate partition just for a bootloader seems like an overkill. BTW, I'm still using LiLo. It boots, what else do you need?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Depends on theManufacturer. Samsung is awful. Sure, it stops boot viruses like Form & co. It doesn't stop you getting hacked, and certainly doesn't make booting any LESS complicated. I resent needless change in software. So when I see a big change coming, I look for WHY it was introduced. Efi was introduced because m$ systems are insecure. Its bizzare that crippleware has become the de facto standard. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK, why must I have it as crippleware in a vastly oversized BIOS in this Samsung i3 (not itanium) laptop (not server)whose sole function in life seems to be to stop me booting anything that isn't m$?? What you say doesn't make sense. There's a bit missing.
|
The problem with (U)EFI is the 'Extensible' bit. Vendors still don't understand that just because they *can* doesn't mean that they *should*. The problem is not with the underlying technology, it's all those 'Marketing' types trying to find "innovative and exciting ways of leveraging UEFI in order to add to the value proposition and positively differentiate their product"(*). Sadly, "less is more" is lost on them.
(*) Yes, I know! Please shoot me now... No, on reflection I take that back... shoot them! ;) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 PM. |