GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
View Poll Results: wich do you perfer yo use, mainstream or minimal distro to start with
mainstream (red hat, mandrake, arch, debian, slackware, etc)
wich is better, main stream or minimal? perosnaly i use minimal for 2 reasons , windows IE couldent dl any iso over 400-500 mb, (debian was curpt when i installed it on a laptop so i wiped it out in fear more tehn jsut x was bad)
2) i use a i586 laptop, so bigger isint realy better
dude you didnt even vote on your own poll. to shame.
i have debian and fedora on computers here. fedora wassnt my choice cos its not my computer that said i like it. i use debian because the computer i put it on is a 486 with a really small HD and debian im informed (havent tried it on anything less) can work on pretty much any setup. which is strangly simular to why you dont use it :P
ps: what does "in fear more tehn jsut x was bad" mean?
eh i thought i 4got somthing, thx for reminding me
and it mean that xf86 was bad, somting about a corupt file during install and i thought other fiels could have been installed that were bad so i zero'ed by HD and tryed LFS, wich didint install cuse i was a root user, so i used core linux sence then (the same distro i used first, and failed to boot, cuse i was a coplete newb)
man i talk to much when it gets to be morning, must be all teh tea i drink, well good morning, and im going to bed cuse i like to sleep in teh day
It's not a matter of which is better but rather which is right for the person. Personally, I use RedHat 9.0 and I'll probably upgrade to Fedora eventually. I use my Linux desktop to surf the net, read emails, and write papers. With the power and speed of current desktops, it's impractical for me to spend time installing a system like Gentoo or LFS.
Location: a tiny place caled hendrik ido ambacht in the netherlands
Distribution: SuSE, debian, slackware, lfs
Hmmm, mainstream vs minimal. But an non-main stream disto need not to be minimal! I have an non-mainstream distro (LFS). For now it's very minimal (since I just finshed installing it yesterday) but it won't be in a few weeks time. So I can't vote on your poll.
Sorry, your poll does not make sense.
i tryed lfs, aparently i could be root so it dident build right and erred out when i recompiled, and im not gonna make another user just to compile things , but by minimal i do mean what was the distro you started with? (mainstream distros tend to have usless apps that will enver get used at all while minimal has just want you wnat/need and not realy much else)
don't forget that a main stream distro can also be minimal. all you have to do is install and downsize. that is what i did with debian. i didn't install all 7 cd's i just installed the first one and then removed what i didn't want and installed what i did want. there for i will say mine is minimal even thought it goes with your mainstream.
I believe RH9 and FC1 had a specific setting for "minimal". I'm not sure what that is since I have never installed it that way.
Well, I am tempted to use minimal, but then I think. Well... I guess I need at least vi and bash and apache... then what fun would apache be without php? Then.... after a few hours, I end up selecting most standard packages anyways. Oh well.
Since I knew I was gonna have to get a CD version, I had to go partly mainstream. and I had to choose one that will run with just 64 Megs RAM. But I can adapt to any OS, even doz
Can't yet say which I prefer til I have tried minimal.