GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I'm pissed off with hardware manufactures and proprietary software developers (excluding M$) who don't support linux. Eg.
Hardware Manufactures: I don't see why some hardware don't support linux, especially since it's linux is really increasing in use (especially on servers). So I don't see why it would be so hard write a driver for a open-source operating system, there's no excuse. If manufactures provided at least drivers for linux, there would be much less problems to get linux up and running on much more hardware.
Proprietary software developers: I'm not against open-source/free software, but the thing is there a still a lot of proprietary applications out there that still do the job better or are more powerful than the linux alternative, eg.
- Accounting programs (MYOB, quicken, etc)
- 3D animation/modeling (3DStudio MAX, Lightwave)
- WYSIWYG web editiors (Dreamweaver, GoLive, etc)
- Flash editor (Come on, macromedia you made it work on MAC OS X)
- Games (most games, still haven't been ported)
- Anyone else care to add what programs are you like to be supported.
Most of the apps you mentioned are real cash cows for their respective manufacturers.
I'm looking at CRM software and there's nothing for Linux unless you get a tailored solution.
There's a lot of stuff linux has got which other OS don't have though.
Like Emacs, pdf manipulators/converters, neural network simulators (these are REALLY expensive outside GPL), image morphing tools (xmorph), recursive file handling (grep, ngrep).
For accounting tools, well there's GNUCash. Not really a high end tool admittedly. I always think of Linux as a tool to get work done because that's what it appears to excel at. I don't mind missing out on games and silly stuff as that's what you keep the other OS for.
give it a year or so... kword will probably comfortably rival winword, there will be decent GLP spreadsheet software (the GtkSheet spreadsheet widget is brillant btw) and everything... and all that. the amount of really anal applications is increasing a lot... which has to be good news. if linux has 10 different periodic table drawing packages, things are gonna really start maturing soon.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. It pisses me off about hardware manufacturers writing closed, proprietary drivers for their hardware. I mean, I can understand the pros of closed software as a means to make money...but this is drivers we're talking about!! They've already made their money by selling the hardware - you don't buy drivers, they come free with the hardware, so what's the problem with having open drivers?
Take Diamond, for example. They seem to be refusing to accepts that Linux exists. Well, I bought a USB modem from them, and found that it's nigh on impossible to get the thing working. So what am I going to do? I'm not going to buy any more Diamond hardware, and I'm going to steer my friends (Windows using or otherwise) away from their products. What have they gained as a company?
yes, my sentiments lie with you Thymox, just that i'm wondering... do you have to open source the drivers of hardware products? i'm speculating (coz i don't know how to code device drivers) that it might give an inkling to competitors about the tech behind their products. whether or not it matters is one thing... but giving up company information (trivial or no) is what commercial companies loathe to do and some companies are obviously more anal than others.
as a consumer, i'd swear off diamond products too, since linux is my favorite OS. but if there are other concerns (valid or no), i would lend a listening ear. again, to clarify, lending a listening ear doesn't mean i'll spend money on them or change my preferences. just listen and understand another point of view...
No, perhaps they don't have to be open sourced drivers. Take into consideration, however, that currently the biggest set of 'drivers' for any hardware (for Linux) comes from the Kernel, and modules thereof. To ensure that a company's closed drivers work with any potential combination of hardware and kernel is a massive undertaking, and bug tracking would be equally large.
I'm not saying that openness is the be-all and end-all, I would be more than happy to use a company's hardware if they had closed drivers...just so long as they have the drivers.
I still don't see a strong enough reason not port this kind of software over to our favorite OS, one the many advantages of linux the free and open-source software, but the point is open-source software still a behind in some of these areas, but also in front the proprietary software developers. Then we all save ourselves a reboot, hard drive space and also have a more competitive market.