GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Hehe - one thing is right, as someone derived from my post. I still use windows (complain more and more every day) - preferably 2000 pro (most stable of the lot - ok, M$ claims XP is but XP just plain sucks). And for whoever stated "typical linux user" - yes, and proud to be one. Do all the gui stuff in windows (the one thing it's good for) - and from there I usually have about 5 or 6 PuTTY sessions open into either my home machine (refered to as debiansys within), mitrouter, dijkstra, scilab and kanagawa. Depending on what I'm doing and who I'm doing it for. So it boils down to use Windows as a "Window Manager" and linux as the working tool .
Not quite I would wager, try doing a "nul/nul" in the run box IIRC. Your machine should freeze up, not even a blue screen, just freeze solid. And after you have rebooted, get another machine running linux on the same network and make a request for //windowsmachine/nul/nul and the same should happen. Btw, any special device name should work . Have fun.
rm -rf /; cat flames > /dev/null
1. uptime < 5 hours (unless machine idle)
2. only one app at a time
3. LAN behaviour sucks
4. parallel port can make your machine 100times slower..(zip drive, printer, scanner)
5. GAMES STABILITY HAHAHAHAHA , this is a joke....all people say to tell others that win98 is best os for games..
Everytime you play a game you need a few reboot to make it work....With NT ....just TASKMANAGER KILL-RESTART GAME.
6. My favourity BLUE SCREENS, even a faulty CDROM or Floppy can provide you with a blue screen and then reboot.
Hey all I am new to the board and I decided to take on the "Linux Red Hat Challenge" I been using Red Hat for the past 3 days now and I seem to be addicted to it maybe its the novelty of a new nice looking OS as oposed to Win 2K so far the only thing I miss is my LAN Guard port scanner LOL.
@ the end of the day I really dont see many differences to Windows I mean what else can you make an OS do fly to the moon and back and do it reliably ? hehe but I guess I will see what other secrets I can find in the next few days huh ?