LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices



Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-23-2004, 01:30 AM   #1561
Thetargos
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico City
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu & Mint
Posts: 1,679

Rep: Reputation: 45

My reason: Because I chose to, when I built my computer.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 08:07 AM   #1562
LinuxSeeker
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Linuxland
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10, KUbuntu 5.10, Mandrake 10.1 - Ubuntu 5.04 (Hoary)
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: 30
Re: Y use Linux instead of windows ??

Quote:
Originally posted by sapilas
Give me a good reason to use Linux as the main system instead of windows..

First time I used I mouse seriously to do some work was in 1997 and I was using Unix - Solaris6 - winNT4. Now I use various linux distros and win2k.

But I still cannot find something that will make me prefer a Linux 2 a winNT (2k) version.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you thing that Linux can do that a win2k OS cannot do ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

? ? ?
I like KDE, the Windows explorer is TOOOOO boring

Last edited by LinuxSeeker; 03-23-2004 at 08:10 AM.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 01:35 PM   #1563
rajbaxi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Distribution: redhat,mandrake,debian
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
what....????? You prefer Win NT over Linux. Come on guy... NT 4.0 was just buggy. 2000 was an improvement, however. XP is ok but is still vulnerable to exploits that NT had. My major point Linux is better than Windows because most of the virii out there don't affect Linux, Unix, or even Mac based computers. Another is that I have better control over my services. Or I don't have to restart my computer when I install something or change a setting.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 01:43 PM   #1564
dushkinup
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Alpha Quadrant, sol system, earth, asia, Israel.
Distribution: Computer I : Slackware 9.1 ; Computer II : Windows XP
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 15
Linux is more secure than any NT system out there. Including Micro$ofts fancy stupid Longhorn.

Linux is way better at multitasking and does the same job four times as fast

Linux can run way more applications. Even some Windows applications.

Linux is way customizable than Windows

In Linux you are not bound to one square look.

The console in Linux can do anything the gui does plus more, Windows can't (and that's why the failsafe command prompt is so fucked up in Windows)

With Linux you can mess arround with your kernel how much you want. In Windows you can't even add a function that will say "Hello world" to the kernel.

Linux supports very old machines

Linux supports various platforms

BOTTTOM LINE

Linux doesn't suck.
(But you do get laid more with Windows)
 
Old 03-23-2004, 01:56 PM   #1565
rajbaxi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Distribution: redhat,mandrake,debian
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
dushkinup: With Linux you can mess arround with your kernel how much you want. In Windows you can't even add a function that will say "Hello world" to the kernel.

Dushkinup is right, due to MS having a non-open source solution, people can't go in and modify the kernel, and scale it to their needs. No, MS users must purchase a full or upgrade version of their operating system. Ex: Let's say I purchase a 64-bit processor. With MS, I would have to purchase a 64-bit version of their OS to get the full benefits of a 64-bit processor. However, with linux, I could recompile my kernel for 64-bit processing (even though it's pretty confusing at first). Learning linux is kind of like learning to switch from Windows 95 to Windows NT or 2000 (just on a much larger scale). You can't learn it over night but when you're used to it, aren't you glad you made the switch?
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:37 PM   #1566
dushkinup
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Alpha Quadrant, sol system, earth, asia, Israel.
Distribution: Computer I : Slackware 9.1 ; Computer II : Windows XP
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 15
Do they even support 64-bit for workstations?....
I'm very glad I switched, cuz I'm gonna buy an AMD 64 on my next machine.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:39 PM   #1567
rajbaxi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Distribution: redhat,mandrake,debian
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
I think AMD can still run the standard 32-bit version of Windows. However, I don't believe you would get any performance gain.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:40 PM   #1568
buttersoft
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 178

Rep: Reputation: 30
rajbaxi

How right you are. Take the trouble, put some effort in and no way will you go back. I have moved on to Slackware, I love the way one can configure this distro, and it is the first where I as a Newbie can really understand where I have to go in and change to make things work. Result is a Linux system without windows of any sort. Loving it. Worth every minute of the learning process.
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:48 PM   #1569
rajbaxi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: MI
Distribution: redhat,mandrake,debian
Posts: 68

Rep: Reputation: 15
Actually... The 64-bit version of Windows is free for existing users. However, it's a Preview and it expires in about a year. How lame. Also, it only works on the AMD 64-bit processors (not the Intel Itaniums).

Here's the link if you're interested:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/6...ds/upgrade.asp
 
Old 03-23-2004, 02:51 PM   #1570
buttersoft
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 178

Rep: Reputation: 30
rajbaxi

That sounds about right. Very lame or typical.........
 
Old 03-24-2004, 01:27 AM   #1571
dushkinup
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Alpha Quadrant, sol system, earth, asia, Israel.
Distribution: Computer I : Slackware 9.1 ; Computer II : Windows XP
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 15
How Microsoftish...
 
Old 03-24-2004, 01:26 PM   #1572
Lleb_KCir
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,765

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally posted by rajbaxi
I think AMD can still run the standard 32-bit version of Windows. However, I don't believe you would get any performance gain.

not true. even with the 32bit OS you still get a lot of performance boost from the AMD64bit chips.

it is not the full benifit, and thus if running M$ OS it is not worth buying the 64bit chip until M$ releases their full vs of the 64bit OS.

from the benchmarks ive seen it is between a 20-40% overall improvement in performance.

i have not seen any benchmarks running the linux 64bit OS on that chip so no clue.

for gamers, wait for the 2nd gen. 64bit chips that are scheduled to be released this summer and the next M$ OS that will fully support the 64bit chipset. otherwise if you are doing desktop or server work, go for it, but be aware you are FUBAR as far as upgrades are concerned as the next gen chip is not backwards compatable so far as hardware is concnernd.
 
Old 03-25-2004, 01:30 PM   #1573
sxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: Mac OS 10.7 / CentOS 6(servers) / xubuntu 13.04
Posts: 1,186

Rep: Reputation: 49
My friend just god a brand new laptop, so instead of saling his old one I told him I would take it and make use of for linux, or let him use it for linux..

He says "Why do I need Linux when windows 95 runs on it just fine, and I did have 98 on it for awhile"

I gave him the link to this thread...
 
Old 03-25-2004, 01:32 PM   #1574
enine
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 819
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 91
tell him windows 95/98 runs fine as long as you don't use it or connect it to the internet
 
Old 03-25-2004, 01:45 PM   #1575
sxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Distribution: Mac OS 10.7 / CentOS 6(servers) / xubuntu 13.04
Posts: 1,186

Rep: Reputation: 49
Well I don't suppose he will be running internet on his old laptop, just on his new windows XP laptop..

I have a windows XP laptop, but its not new, and needs work.
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
first, linux, post, switch


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zoom modem/switch & linux<->linux network: DHCP / Static ? tredegar Linux - Networking 8 11-11-2007 04:41 AM
Hardware Switch; Linux and Windows; Linux Wins!! AvePtah LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 5 11-25-2006 06:10 PM
Want to switch to Linux but need help snatale1 Linux - Newbie 9 03-17-2006 10:33 PM
thread switch results in kernel stack switch superstition Linux - General 1 05-18-2005 12:48 AM
set up DSL thru SWITCH - winXp connected to SWITCH too husz Linux - Newbie 5 04-22-2004 01:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration