LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

View Poll Results: Which is your favourite OS ?
Linux 33 86.84%
Microsoft Windows 2 5.26%
Mac OS X 4 10.53%
Other (please specify) 8 21.05%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2011, 05:21 AM   #1
dEnDrOn
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: oMNipre$ent
Distribution: fedora 3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE
Posts: 499
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Question which OS do you like most ?


please vote for your favourite Operating System.

Last edited by dEnDrOn; 07-16-2011 at 03:01 AM.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 05:28 AM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 15,411
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995
Is such a poll on a Linux forum not simply pointless?
 
Old 07-11-2011, 05:36 AM   #3
chrisretusn
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 468

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I suppose it is, but I do have a favorite OS and it's not Linux; it's OS/2, I still use it too. Another favorite that I use is OS X, waiting for the Lion to roar.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 05:50 AM   #4
dEnDrOn
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: oMNipre$ent
Distribution: fedora 3.6.11-1.fc17.i686.PAE
Posts: 499
Blog Entries: 12

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Is such a poll on a Linux forum not simply pointless?
i didn't think that way....
 
Old 07-11-2011, 08:10 AM   #5
Arcane
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Latvia, Europe
Distribution: random
Posts: 287

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Bit unfair poll since Linux and BSD is cost free and Windows and Mac is something to pay for(we all know people hate Win and Mac because of that not because they are badly wrongly made)..anyway my favourite OS is one that just works when needed.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 08:53 AM   #6
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,043
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369Reputation: 1369
Moved: This thread is more suitable in <General> and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 09:02 AM   #7
SL00b
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: LA, US
Distribution: SLES
Posts: 375

Rep: Reputation: 111Reputation: 111
Terrible question. It's like asking what's your favorite tool. My favorite tool is the one that does the best job for the specific thing I'm trying to accomplish at any particular moment in time.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 09:21 AM   #8
SigTerm
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 379

Rep: Reputation: 233Reputation: 233Reputation: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by dEnDrOn View Post
which OS do you like most ?
None of them. Every OS have some kind of problem, so there are no favorites and you could say I dislike all of them. I use whatever gets the job done.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 09:42 AM   #9
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,897
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The one I'm using now.
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:52 PM   #10
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,189
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 278Reputation: 278Reputation: 278
Hey...

A bit obvious, but still. By the way, there is an OS/2 fan in here! Cool!!! I was into that when lose311 was around, I liked it for the pre-emptive multitasking.

Did'nt know that was still around

Cool
 
Old 07-11-2011, 02:53 PM   #11
dugan
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 4,562

Rep: Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394Reputation: 1394
The only reason you included the poll was to make it harder to merge this into the Windows vs Linux thread, wasn't it.

BTW, I agree with the people who said the question is terrible. Linux isn't my favorite OS for playing games, for example.

Last edited by dugan; 07-11-2011 at 03:10 PM.
 
Old 07-15-2011, 12:18 PM   #12
//////
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Land of Linux :: Finland
Distribution: Dual boot :: Windows vista 64-bit | Kali linux 64bit multi lib
Posts: 154

Rep: Reputation: 33
My favorite is OpenBSD, linux second, then windows :P
Security first, then comes usability, last is gaming.
 
Old 07-15-2011, 03:31 PM   #13
-demo-
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: $RANDOM
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
In all honesty, I actually claim Linux has my favorite, O/S.
The reason not being because we are on a Linux based forum but because of GNU/Linux's feature set and abilities.

Let's be honest, no one likes to be scammed by gimmicks, so why do other O/S developers charge money for features that a super user would use?

Linux's support for 32bit PAE (Physical Address Extension) mode for instance, well for a while 4 gigabytes of RAM has been the standard, so then why does Microsoft exclude this feature in Basic all the way to Ultimate edition? In fact you can only enable more then 4 gigabytes of memory on there server editions. I don't see how this option effects the price tag. I don't mind paying for software at all, but when developers do things like this it bugs me, because really there is no reason for it.

Linux can also run all binaries doesn't matter if there 4 bits, 8 bits, 16 bits, 32 bits or 64 bits, Microsoft claims when in 64 bit mode 16 bits can not be accessed...This is not true at all! The real reason is they simply dropped compatibility support. Why lie? Why not just tell people that support for 4~16 bit binaries as been discontinued.

Older protocol support is another plus on why I like Linux, doesn't matter what bit mode I am in I still have SLIP, IPX, TCP/IP, and a whole bunch more... these actually are useful for gamers that use DOSEmu or DOSBox because they can be used with TCP/IP to encapsulate whatever protocol might be used for older software. Allowing real Dukematchers to play the original Duke 3D the was it was meant to be played.


The bad parts of Linux are the lack of games that are commercially developed. The WINE project works wonders but is not perfect, has its bugs and those don't always get fixed as fast as possible. So yes Windows in this way is better, but that is not a deal breaker for me, most of all my software works within WINE or runs naively.

On the business end Linux suffers a blow on the desktop because of it's lack of exchange support. But that is not really and issue because with a willing boss the company can ditch exchange for something that is more friendly for Linux and friends.

Linux is best for what I do daily and I would never switch to anything else. It does everything I want it to and nothing more.
 
Old 07-15-2011, 03:38 PM   #14
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,665

Rep: Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683Reputation: 1683
none of those are "operating systems "
they are platforms

There is NO OS called "linux"
-- there is RHEL,SELS ,Ubuntu, fedora ...--

There is NO OS called "Microsoft Windows "
-- there is 98, ME,XP,vista,7 ---

There is NO OS called "Mac OS X"
 
Old 07-15-2011, 03:46 PM   #15
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Quote:
There is NO OS called "Mac OS X"
I thought that was supposed to be short for "Macintosh Operating System 10"…

Besides that, I thought the underlying system of Mac OS X was called "Darwin"…and the kernel "Mach".

I'm no expert on OS X, so if anyone knows better, don't hesitate to correct me.

As for "which OS I like the best", I don't think it's really fair to vote; this is a Linux forum, after all.

Basically anything UNIX-like, as it interests me.

Last edited by MrCode; 07-15-2011 at 03:48 PM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
linux, mac, operating system, windows


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration