LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2013, 08:59 AM   #1
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,268

Rep: Reputation: 49
Which is the powerful one: Audacity or Audacious?


Hi: That is the question. Reworded: which is the famous one?

Last edited by stf92; 01-28-2013 at 09:01 AM.
 
Old 01-28-2013, 09:26 AM   #2
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
Probably you mean Audacity, it plays files and is also a sound editor. Audacious is just another player.
 
Old 01-28-2013, 01:08 PM   #3
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,268

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9 View Post
Probably you mean Audacity, it plays files and is also a sound editor. Audacious is just another player.
I do not understand then how Slackware, who included mplayer in their distros, have not done the same with Audacity. Perhaps slackbuilds, which seems to be a Slackware extension.
 
Old 01-28-2013, 01:39 PM   #4
Thad E Ginataom
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 with KXStudio, MATE & Compiz
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 7
Audacity is only a player in the sense that if you press "play" sound will come out of your speakers. Probably nobody would choose it as their media player. Even, for instance, loading a file will take time, because Audacity imports it and then regards it as part of a project. It is a multitrack recording and editing tool. You could do other stuff with too, eg comparing wave display or spectrum display (I think it does spectrum). It is a technical tool, not a player.

If you want it included as standard, most probably one of the multi-media-based distributions will have it as standard, along with a lot of other audio-visual manipulation tools. Otherwise, you will have to install it. If there is no package for your distribution, download the source and compile it. It is fairly easy, as compiles go, but I have Ubuntu Studio + KXStudio, so some AV-specific library stuff may be there that might not be on a non-av-special distribution.

Last edited by Thad E Ginataom; 01-28-2013 at 01:42 PM.
 
Old 01-28-2013, 01:42 PM   #5
stf92
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: Buenos Aires.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,268

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 49
Thanks. I understand. Too specialized to be included in a distribution like Slackware.

Last edited by stf92; 01-28-2013 at 07:03 PM.
 
Old 02-04-2013, 07:24 AM   #6
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginataom View Post
Audacity is only a player in the sense that if you press "play" sound will come out of your speakers. Probably nobody would choose it as their media player.
I and most people wouldn't use audacity as a player, but some do.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by timsoft View Post
It would be nice to see audacity on the list. I use it for recording and listening.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ml#post4883996
 
Old 02-05-2013, 04:32 PM   #7
Thad E Ginataom
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04 with KXStudio, MATE & Compiz
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 7
OK... Insert a "probably" in front of my "wouldn't."

Some people probably like watching dancing waveforms as they watch. It has more use than random graphics, like, for instance, being able to find and cue the point from which you want to listen, do A-B looping, etc etc.

I use jack, which most people would not do, just for listening. At first, I used it because I have a firewire audio device. Then I found KXStudio, which makes the firewire device work and fairly simple to use with its Cadence tools. I "wire in" studio EQ software to compensate for my hearing loss. It's nice to be able to hear the treble again.

Although I don't make music, I too enjoy playing with this stuff, and Linux makes that possible
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Audacious in current kikinovak Slackware 7 09-26-2012 10:09 AM
LXer: Get Going Quickly with the Powerful Audacity Audio Platform LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-12-2012 11:51 PM
Alternative to Audacious for eac cuesheets, midi playback (hardware)? Fix audacious? Holering Linux - Software 0 10-03-2010 12:19 AM
LXer: Audacious 2.1 Review - Powerful Audio Replacement for XMMS LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-23-2009 10:31 AM
Cannot run Audacity : "Audacity is already running" tuanito Linux - Software 7 06-11-2009 07:02 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration