GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
"Linus likes penguins". That's it. There was even a headline on it in some Linux Journal some time ago (I was bitten by a Killer Penguin in Australia - I'm not kidding). Penguins are fun.
As to why use a penguin as a logo? No good reason, really. But a logo doesn't really ave to _mean_ anything - it's the association that counts. And I can think of many worse things than have linux being associated with penguins.
Having a penguin as a logo also gives more freedom to people wanting to use linux-related material: instead of being firmly fixed with a specific logo (the triangle, or just "Linux 2.0" or some other abstract thing), using something like a penguin gives people the chance to make modifications that are still recognizable.
So you can have a real live penguin on a CD cover, for example, and people will get the association. Or you can have a penguin that does something specific (a Penguin writing on wordperfect for the WP Linux CD, whatever - you get the idea).
Compare that to a more abstract logo (like the windows logo - it's not a bad logo in itself). You can't really do anything with a logo like that. It just "is".
If you have seen the movie "March of the Penguins", then you can see some parallels: Teamwork, struggle for survival, etc.
Look at the scene where they are all huddled for the winter--keeping each other warm and protecting their eggs. That's us.
The brutal antartic winter is of course a metaphor for the MS establishment.
Initially, I think that's one of the reasons I like linux, it had a cool logo! Seriously though, tux is probably the coolest logo I've seen(w/ the BSD daemon coming in close 2nd)
Distribution: Suse (10.2, 10.3), CentOS, and Ubuntu
Posts: 1,794
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoody_goon
What would you have Linux use as a logo or symbol a butterfly, who in there right mind would use a butterfly.
Oh wait never mind.
Why not a butterfly? I have a nice butterfly tattoo on my back!
No, not the M$ butterfly - a butterfly I was drawing for a while, then saw a tat with the exact same butterfly I had in mind and had been drawing, just changed the coloring a bit and had it done.
The same could be asked of the BSD logo: why a devil? Isn't Satan supposed to be evil? Wouldn't Beastie, being a demon, be a servant of Satan? The answer is: it's just a cute recognizable drawing and the FreeBSD folks liked it, so they used it as their logo for a good long while. With that said, Tux is cute and is a great memorable logo.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.