llama_meme |
03-28-2003 10:04 AM |
Quote:
It seems to be a soft spot for the British, and most Europeans saying the Germany would have won the war without US help. I am sorry, that's the way it is.
|
No it isn't. Germany would still have lost to Russia (though the war would have been more protracted and bloody). However, I think other posters' criticisms of America for entering WW2 for its own self-interest is wrong. Maybe that's why the politicians decided to enter it, but ordinary American soldiors must surely have believed that they were fighting because it was the right thing to do (which it was).
As for appeasement, I think you can draw a neat analogy betweeen the situation with Hitler in the 30s and the situation with Saddam Hussein now, but there's not necessarily any reason to believe history will repeat itself in this case. You can probably come up with a historical analogy to support pretty much any political position.
Quote:
To me the oil argument is garbage, as I stated, the US get's less than 3% of it's oil from Iraq.
|
Exactly, it wants (needs) to get more. It's also a PR thing - it's easy for us cynics to look at the Bush administration and see oil, oil and more oil, just because of the business connections. Incedentally, I think the argument that Iraq should be invaded to ensure Western/American supplies of oil in the short term is actually quite a legitimate one; it's the duplicity that bothers me.
Quote:
To Leme_Lama, I hope our differences of opinions on this situation doesn't prevent us from potentially helping eachother out with a technical problem ni the future. I have no hard feelings.
|
No hard feelings here either :)
Alex
|